2012
DOI: 10.1080/14631377.2012.729662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of personal income tax changes in Slovenia

Abstract: Slovenia belongs to a group of EU member states that have reduced their personal income tax burden during the current financial and economic crisis. The latest changes, introduced in the personal income tax system during the last two years, have primarily reduced the tax burden on low-income taxpayers. However, this was only the last step in a series of personal income tax reforms since 2004 that have on average reduced the tax burden on all taxpayers. Using an exclusive database of taxpayers and utilising a g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the current tax systems in both countries are different and hardly resemble the common ex-Yugoslavian basis. While Slovenia shaped its tax KEYWORDS Redistributive effects; income tax; policy switching; income inequality; tax progressivity; microsimulation system towards a highly progressive PIT (Čok, Sambt, Košak, Verbič, & Majcen, 2012;Majcen, Verbič, Bayar, & Čok, 2009), the FBH accepted a flat PIT concept. SSC also experienced divergent movements: ratio between the employers (10.5%) and employee rate (31.0%) in the FBH is more biased towards the employees than in Slovenia (16.1% versus 22.1%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the current tax systems in both countries are different and hardly resemble the common ex-Yugoslavian basis. While Slovenia shaped its tax KEYWORDS Redistributive effects; income tax; policy switching; income inequality; tax progressivity; microsimulation system towards a highly progressive PIT (Čok, Sambt, Košak, Verbič, & Majcen, 2012;Majcen, Verbič, Bayar, & Čok, 2009), the FBH accepted a flat PIT concept. SSC also experienced divergent movements: ratio between the employers (10.5%) and employee rate (31.0%) in the FBH is more biased towards the employees than in Slovenia (16.1% versus 22.1%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%