2003
DOI: 10.1094/pdis.2003.87.10.1221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of Leaf-Feeding Beetles and Bean pod mottle virus (BPMV) in Illinois and Transmission of BPMV in Soybean

Abstract: Bean leaf beetles (BLB; Cerotoma trifurcata) were collected in soybean (Glycine max) fields in 58 and 99 Illinois counties surveyed during the 2000 and 2001 growing seasons, respectively. In 2000, BLB counts were highest in the central portion of the state. BLB counts were lower the following year, but were more uniformly distributed throughout the state. BLB tested positive for Bean pod mottle virus (BPMV) in 37 of 41 counties assayed in 2000. In 2001, BLB tested positive for BPMV in 86 of 99 counties sampled… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because information on bean leaf beetle physiological tolerances is limited, we followed the methods of model fit from Sutherst et al . (), with parameters being adjusted primarily to match North American distribution and relative abundance data obtained from a variety of sources (Leonard & Turner, ; Nichols et al ., ; Herzog, ; Boiteau et al ., ; Loughran & Ragsdale, ; Payah & Boethel, ; Felton et al ., ; Pedigo, ; Tonhasca, ; Buntin et al ., ; Danielson et al ., ; Lam et al ., ; Srinivas et al ., ; Krell et al ., ; Mabry et al ., ; Riley et al ., ; Carrillo et al ., ; Park & Krell, ; Lundgren & Riedell, ; Hammack et al ., ; Vlach et al ., ; Musser et al ., ; Tiroesele et al ., ). Southern Ontario distribution data were obtained from extensive sampling in 2010 by T. Baute (unpublished data).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because information on bean leaf beetle physiological tolerances is limited, we followed the methods of model fit from Sutherst et al . (), with parameters being adjusted primarily to match North American distribution and relative abundance data obtained from a variety of sources (Leonard & Turner, ; Nichols et al ., ; Herzog, ; Boiteau et al ., ; Loughran & Ragsdale, ; Payah & Boethel, ; Felton et al ., ; Pedigo, ; Tonhasca, ; Buntin et al ., ; Danielson et al ., ; Lam et al ., ; Srinivas et al ., ; Krell et al ., ; Mabry et al ., ; Riley et al ., ; Carrillo et al ., ; Park & Krell, ; Lundgren & Riedell, ; Hammack et al ., ; Vlach et al ., ; Musser et al ., ; Tiroesele et al ., ). Southern Ontario distribution data were obtained from extensive sampling in 2010 by T. Baute (unpublished data).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bean leaf beetle (Cerotoma trifurcata Forster [Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae]) is another predominant, but sporadic, pest of soybeans in this region. Adults of this pest defoliate soybean plants and transmit bean pod mottle virus (Mabry et al, 2003;Bradshaw et al, 2008;Byamukama et al, 2011), and larvae consume root nodules of the soybean plant and disrupt its nitrogen dynamics Riedell et al, 2011). These two pests support a diverse and abundant natural enemy community throughout much of the soybeanproducing region of North America (Toepfer et al, 2009;Ragsdale et al, 2011), but this natural enemy community has been poorly described in the Northern Great Plains (but see Seagraves and Lundgren, 2012 for one report).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly used method for detection of BPMV is the sandwich enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Mabry et al, 2003). This method, though highly sensitive, has a number of drawbacks that make it less than ideal for certain applications.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Severe infections can lead to up to 52% losses in crop yield due to smaller seed size and discoloration (Gergerich, 1999). Additionally, co-infection of crops with BPMV and Soybean mosaic virus (SMV) can lead to devastating reductions of crop yields of up to 85% (Mabry et al, 2003; Ross, 1968). Because of the large number of samples to be analyzed in monitoring the speed and breadth of disease transmission, it is clear that techniques capable of detecting viruses with minimal sample preparation and rapid time-to-result are valuable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%