Human Blood Group Systems and Haemoglobinopathies 2021
DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.90372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of Clinically Relevant Blood Group Antigens among Nigerians and the Management of Rhesus D Negative Pregnancies: Implications for Haemolytic Disease of the Foetus and Newborn and Haemolytic Transfusion Reactions

Abstract: The ABO and Rhesus blood group systems are the most clinically relevant blood group systems from haemolytic disease of the foetus and newborn (HDFN) and haemolytic transfusion reaction (HTR) perspectives. Other clinically relevant blood group systems include the Kell, Duffy, Kidd and MNSs blood group systems. The clinical relevance of a blood group system depends on the ability of antibodies of the system to cause HDFN and HTR. This chapter discusses the distribution of ABO, Rhesus and other clinically relevan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the naturally occurring antibodies include anti-Cw, anti-M, and antibodies in the Ii, Lewis, and P systems are not clinically significant, except for ABO antibodies. Furthermore, immune antibodies are clinically significant and produced specifically against RBC antigens such as antibodies in the K, Rh, Duffy, and Kidd systems [1][2][3]. From a total of 360 RBC antigens recognized by the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT), 330 were grouped into 39 blood group systems [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the naturally occurring antibodies include anti-Cw, anti-M, and antibodies in the Ii, Lewis, and P systems are not clinically significant, except for ABO antibodies. Furthermore, immune antibodies are clinically significant and produced specifically against RBC antigens such as antibodies in the K, Rh, Duffy, and Kidd systems [1][2][3]. From a total of 360 RBC antigens recognized by the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT), 330 were grouped into 39 blood group systems [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Eastern and Southern African countries, blood group O dominated the populace, while in Pakistan and some regions in India on the Asian continent, blood group B dominated [25][26][27]. In addition to being the most common blood group in our population, the high rate of utilization of blood group O is seen where there is an inadequate supply of donor blood, particularly in emergencies when it is commonly used as universal donor units for transfusion to A, B, and AB recipients, is is predicated on the premise that blood group O red cells lack A and B antigens on their cell membrane surfaces, despite the risk of the presence of anti-A and anti-B haemolysins in blood type O donors [28]. Contrary to the report by Enosolease et al [12], our study revealed that blood utilization was more than supplied by the blood bank.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional clinically useful blood group systems include those of Kell, Duffy, Kidd, MNS, Diegos, and others. (Erhabor et al, 2021). Therefore the relevance of blood group systems is seen in ensuring compatibility of the donor and the recipient.…”
Section: Relevance Of Blood Group Systems In Medical Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of compatibility testing helps to avoid alloimmunization and hemolytic transfusion responses when a recipient receives a transfusion of a donor's blood. Sensitization by a foreign antigen and subsequent exposure to the same antigen, respectively, result in alloimmunization and hemolytic transfusion responses (Erhabor et al, 2021;Haryani et al, 2017). The compatibility testing includes: ABO and Rhesus blood typing, antibody screening meant for the detection of unexpected antibodies and cross matching (Obeta et al, 2020).…”
Section: Compatibility Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation