2020
DOI: 10.1111/voxs.12576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of ABO and Rh (D) Blood groups in India: A systematic review

Abstract: Background Blood group selection can be influenced by environmental, geographical conditions and migration frequency of population. Knowledge about distribution of blood groups is important for inventory management and disease trends in relation to blood groups. Aim of this systematic review was to know the distribution of ABO & Rh (D) blood groups in India.Methods This systematic review was based on literature search from January 2001 to December 2018 on ABO and Rh (D) distribution in all states of India. We … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
20
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(10 reference statements)
2
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Blood Group (BG) distribution of subjects in our study was similar to national reference based on a recent systematic review. 13 Sero-positivity was significantly different between different groups, being highest for blood group type AB (10•19%) followed by B (9•94%), O (7•09%) and A (6•97%). Blood Group O was found to be associated with a lower sero-positivity rate, with an OR of 0•76 (95 % CI 0•64 -0•91, p=0•018) vs Non O blood group types, while B appeared to be at high-risk with an OR of 1•36 (95 % CI 1•15 -1•61, p=0•001).…”
Section: Survey Based Correlates Of Seropositivitymentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Blood Group (BG) distribution of subjects in our study was similar to national reference based on a recent systematic review. 13 Sero-positivity was significantly different between different groups, being highest for blood group type AB (10•19%) followed by B (9•94%), O (7•09%) and A (6•97%). Blood Group O was found to be associated with a lower sero-positivity rate, with an OR of 0•76 (95 % CI 0•64 -0•91, p=0•018) vs Non O blood group types, while B appeared to be at high-risk with an OR of 1•36 (95 % CI 1•15 -1•61, p=0•001).…”
Section: Survey Based Correlates Of Seropositivitymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Apart from gender and age, distribution of the other variables recorded in CSIR-cohort (prevalence of smoking, diet, physiological parameters like ABO blood group type) were similar to the national averages and the sample can be considered representative. [13][14][15] The univariate associations are shown in Figure 3, separately for each gender. Due to gender imbalance and possible confounding between various parameters, significance of associations was further tested in a balanced iterative logistic regression (Figure 3 Supplement Figure 1).…”
Section: Survey Based Correlates Of Seropositivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on Rh type, Rh(D) positive and Rh(D) negative population were 94.13% and 5.87%, respectively. 9 In the United States of America, the frequency distribution of blood group O varies from 39.8% in Asian donors to 56.5% in Hispanic donors, and the proportion of Rh (D) negative varies from 1.7% in Asian donors to 17.3% in White non-Hispanic donors. 6 Blood group A (43.8%) was the most frequent and AB the least frequent, and Rh positivity rate was 85% in Turkey.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blood Group (BG) distribution of individuals in our study was similar to national reference based on a recent systematic review (eTable 2). 20 Sero-prevalence was highest for blood group type AB (10·19%) followed by group B (9·94%), group O (7·09%) and the lowest for group A (6·97%). Blood O was observed to be protective, with an odds ratio of 0·76 (95 % CI 0·64 −0·91, p=0·018) vs Non O blood group types, while B appeared to be associated with higher sero-positivity 1·36 (95 % CI 1·15 −1·61, p=0·001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Apart from gender and age, distribution of the other variables recorded in CSIR-cohort (prevalence of smoking, diet, physiological parameters like ABO blood group type) were not much different from the national averages. 20,21…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%