2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2010.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution network phase load balancing as a combinatorial optimization problem using fuzzy logic and Newton–Raphson

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This helps in accommodating more DG variations in the network without incurring voltage constraint violations if the most probable scenario takes place. However, the optimal configuration (4,8,11) at 13:00 shown in Table 4, found by the MPS method, results in constraint violation if the worst case scenario (scenario2) takes place because the MPS method does not take into account the worst case scenario when finding the optimal configuration.…”
Section: Grid Reconfiguration Under Der Uncertainty-open Loop Implemementioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This helps in accommodating more DG variations in the network without incurring voltage constraint violations if the most probable scenario takes place. However, the optimal configuration (4,8,11) at 13:00 shown in Table 4, found by the MPS method, results in constraint violation if the worst case scenario (scenario2) takes place because the MPS method does not take into account the worst case scenario when finding the optimal configuration.…”
Section: Grid Reconfiguration Under Der Uncertainty-open Loop Implemementioning
confidence: 92%
“…EVs) provide (7,9,11) (right) [15]. [6][7][8]. Under emergency operating conditions like faults in the lines, transformers or protection devices, [9,10] focused on minimizing the number of interrupted customers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem is constrained to a limited number of phase changes, since a significant reduction of the unbalance is achievable with only few changes. Moreover, the more the changes, the higher the cost for the DSO [7]. Different objectives can be taken to be minimized, like the minimization of the Voltage Unbalance Factor (VUF).…”
Section: Phase Switchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its main component is the LCS, which supervises energy consumption in residential units to identify imbalanced load feeders assuming that a selection can be made for switching in the LV grid. Simultaneously, the Feeder Control Supervisor (FCS) identifies the grid feeder load imbalance, and coordinates the load transfer to reestablish the steady state [38].…”
Section: Urban Microgrid In the Smart-grid Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative to implementing the above-mentioned techniques is phase-load balancing, which consists of switching single-phase consumer units to the phases of the LV grid that are balanced. The procedure is based on the use of identification algorithms and load transfer management, aiming at minimizing current and load consumption [38] or voltage and load [27]. In both cases, the voltage and load equilibrium state in the grid phases is guaranteed; however, the switching choice is based only on current load consumption of consumers' units, disregarding the imbalance level and the future states of load consumption, which could contribute to the robustness of the system to eventual consumption peaks and to the durability of the load stability over time.By contrast, it has been observed that the use of Petri nets (PNs) in complex systems is quite broad [39], due to its formal modeling, simulation and property verification capabilities [40][41][42], which allows development and verification of intelligent algorithms for control and supervision of application in smart grids [43,44].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%