1987
DOI: 10.2307/2531950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution-Free Confidence Intervals for Pr(X 1 < X 2 )

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given m and n, the calculated limits now depend on the data only viaÂ: loosely, may be regarded as 'su cient' for the limits. All methods included in this evaluation apart from Hanley and McNeil's original method 1 [3] and the Halperin-Mee method 6 [5,6] have this simplifying property. 3.…”
Section: Definitions Of 8 Asymptotic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given m and n, the calculated limits now depend on the data only viaÂ: loosely, may be regarded as 'su cient' for the limits. All methods included in this evaluation apart from Hanley and McNeil's original method 1 [3] and the Halperin-Mee method 6 [5,6] have this simplifying property. 3.…”
Section: Definitions Of 8 Asymptotic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, some work has been developed in nonparametric settings. Here, we should cite Birnbaum and McCarty [12] for confidence intervals for using Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistics, Sen [13,14] and Hilgers [15] for asymptotic normality of the Studentized Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney statistics, Cheng and Chao [16] for comparison of the various types of confidence intervals, Halperin et al [17] and Feigin et al [18] for interval estimations based on pivotal quantities. See also Hanley and McNeil [19], Mee [20] and the most recent comprehensive papers by Newcombe [21,22].…”
Section: W Zhoumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although others suggest several competitive estimators of 2 , (see Chapter 5 of Kotz et al [11]), there is no further development in approximating the distribution of the Studentizedˆ . See Cheng and Chao [16], Halperin et al [17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjects were rated for impulsivity using the Monroe dyscontrol scale (RDS) [23,24] that can range from 0 to 54. Scores for the 19 subjects were 4*, 5,8,12,14,16,18,19,23,24,28,29,35, 36*, 38*, 39*, 39, 44* and 45*. Scores for 6 subjects with history of head injury leading to loss of consciousness for over 48 hours are asterisked.…”
Section: An Examplementioning
confidence: 99%