2005
DOI: 10.1002/sim.2323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confidence intervals for an effect size measure based on the Mann–Whitney statistic. Part 1: general issues and tail‐area‐based methods

Abstract: For two random variables X and Y, theta = Pr[Y > X] + (1/2)Pr[Y = X] is advocated as a general measure of effect size to characterize the degree of separation of their distributions. It is estimated by U/mn, a generalization of the Mann-Whitney U statistic, derived by dividing U by the product of the two sample sizes. It is equivalent to the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. It is readily visualized in terms of two Gaussian distributions with appropriately separated peaks. The effect of d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
111
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
111
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This relative effect size statistic, q, can be regarded as expressing the degree of separation between two frequency distributions. The statistic q is analogous to the standardised difference obtained for normally distributed data by dividing the difference of the means by the pooled standard deviation (37,38).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This relative effect size statistic, q, can be regarded as expressing the degree of separation between two frequency distributions. The statistic q is analogous to the standardised difference obtained for normally distributed data by dividing the difference of the means by the pooled standard deviation (37,38).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of these systolic parameters for the diagnosis of ARVD was assessed with a nonparametric comparison of the areas under the ROC curves (33)(34)(35)(36). The threshold values of the parameters that succeeded in differentiating patients with diffuse or localized ARVD from control subjects were chosen to maximize Youden's index (37), and the sensitivities and specificities of these tests were computed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional to these analyses, standardised mean difference effect size, Cohen's d, with its 95% confidence interval is also reported (for Mann-Whitney tests, effect sizes and confidence intervals are based on methods developed by Newcombe, 2006aNewcombe, , 2006b). The present study adopted Hattie's (2009) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%