2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10872-020-00549-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution, biomass, and species composition of salps and doliolids in the Oyashio–Kuroshio transitional region: potential impact of massive bloom on the pelagic food web

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, assuming the same laboratory-derived constant feeding rate for D. tritonis and applying Q 10 = 3 (Haskell et al, 1999) to correct for the mean 14.25 • C observed in 2016-2017, the aggregated gonozooids at ∼3,000 ind m −3 can sweep clear their resident water volume in ∼47 h ingesting 0.045 g C m −3 day −1 . Similarly, less dense aggregations of doliolids in the Oyashio-Kuroshio transitional region cleared their residential volume in ∼10 days (Ishak et al, 2020). While no direct measurements of primary productivity were obtained during our cruises, model simulations run for 2000-2013 using the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS) with an embedded nutrient-phytoplankton-zooplankton (NPZ) estimated late summer (September-October) mean primary production at 30.5 g C m −2 in the upper 30 m layer for the offshore region "P5" from the Canadian boundary to 147 • W (Coyle et al, 2019), which converts to a daily value of 0.0169 g C m −3 day −1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Thus, assuming the same laboratory-derived constant feeding rate for D. tritonis and applying Q 10 = 3 (Haskell et al, 1999) to correct for the mean 14.25 • C observed in 2016-2017, the aggregated gonozooids at ∼3,000 ind m −3 can sweep clear their resident water volume in ∼47 h ingesting 0.045 g C m −3 day −1 . Similarly, less dense aggregations of doliolids in the Oyashio-Kuroshio transitional region cleared their residential volume in ∼10 days (Ishak et al, 2020). While no direct measurements of primary productivity were obtained during our cruises, model simulations run for 2000-2013 using the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS) with an embedded nutrient-phytoplankton-zooplankton (NPZ) estimated late summer (September-October) mean primary production at 30.5 g C m −2 in the upper 30 m layer for the offshore region "P5" from the Canadian boundary to 147 • W (Coyle et al, 2019), which converts to a daily value of 0.0169 g C m −3 day −1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Doliolids occur circumglobally on wide subtropical shelves where upwelling, eddies, or other processes generate nutrient input that promotes phytoplankton blooms (Paffenhöfer et al 1995;Deibel 1998;Nakamura 1998). Because doliolids have high filtering rates and efficiencies and can reach great abundances, they have the potential to remove a significant fraction of shelf water column primary production and can restructure shelf pelagic food webs (Deibel 1985;Paffenhöfer et al 1995;Takahashi et al 2015;Ishak et al 2020). Many investigators have speculated on the significance of blooms of small gelatinous zooplankton species and, the few studies that have been conducted, generally support the idea that doliolids and other thaliaceans can act to intensify microbial loop processes.…”
Section: Potential Ecological Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ecological significance of pelagic tunicate blooms, however, can be highly variable and dependent on the location, duration, and blooming species. Because doliolids are efficient filter feeders (Deibel 1998; Takahashi et al 2015; Ishak et al 2020) and produce low‐density fecal pellets with slow sinking rates (Deibel 1990; Patonai et al 2011), they have the potential to significantly influence shelf carbon cycling, pelagic ecology, and pelagic–benthic coupling (Deibel 1985; Ishak et al 2020). Although the exact mechanisms contributing to doliolid bloom formation remain unclear, the presence of fine‐scale oceanographic boundaries, including vertical pycnoclines and horizontal fronts, appears to be an important factor (Takahashi et al 2015; Martin et al 2017; Greer et al 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study investigated the associated microbiome of D. gegenbauri and how it may differed from their organic-rich fecal pellets and from the surrounding seawater, thus advancing our current knowledge on how pelagic tunicates such as doliolids may influence the microbial loop and key biogeochemical processes in the ocean (Frischer et al, 2021;Ishak et al, 2020;Koster & Paffenhofer, 2016). Amplicon 16S rRNA data from three independent feeding experiments suggested that the patterns of alpha and beta diversity among sample types were highly consistent.…”
Section: Doliolid Associated Microbiome: Patterns Of Abundance and Di...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ecological significance of doliolid blooms, however, can be highly variable and dependent on the location, duration, and blooming species. Because doliolids are efficient filter feeders (Don Deibel & Paffenhöfer, 1988;Ishak et al, 2020;Takahashi et al, 2015) and produce low-density fecal pellets with slow sinking rates (Don Deibel, 1990;Patonai, El-Shaffey, & Paffenhöfer, 2011), it is believed that they have the potential to significantly influence shelf carbon cycling, pelagic ecology, and pelagic-benthic coupling (Don Deibel, 1985;Ishak et al, 2020). To our knowledge, however, their influence on the ocean microbiome and microbially-mediated processes has not been carefully explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%