2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2015.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution and storage of crop residue carbon in aggregates and its contribution to organic carbon of soil with low fertility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
35
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(62 reference statements)
7
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, both the NPKM and NPKS treatments may benefit soil C sequestration because of their relatively low phenol oxidase activity (Fig 3). In contrast, NPK might limit SOC content due to a high peroxidase activity under NPK, which negatively affects labile organic carbon fraction [46]. RDA showed that changes in enzyme activities depended on soil available P and N (Fig 4), consistent with the previous finding that soil enzymes are correlated with nutrient availability [47].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In this way, both the NPKM and NPKS treatments may benefit soil C sequestration because of their relatively low phenol oxidase activity (Fig 3). In contrast, NPK might limit SOC content due to a high peroxidase activity under NPK, which negatively affects labile organic carbon fraction [46]. RDA showed that changes in enzyme activities depended on soil available P and N (Fig 4), consistent with the previous finding that soil enzymes are correlated with nutrient availability [47].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Similar to the results reported by other studies (Garcia-Franco, Albaladejo, Almagro, & Martínez-Mena, 2015;Li et al, 2016), the results presented also indicate that NTS increased POC and MOC at the 0-5 cm depth ( Figure S1). Furthermore, the increment in the 0-5 cm depth resulted from the homogeneous distribution of POC (Wander & Traina, 1996) with a low C mineralization potential (Alvarez & Alvarez, 2000).…”
Section: Contribution Of Soc Fractions To Soc Variabilitysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…(Ordóñez-Fernández et al 2007) found that 53% of wheat straw was left after 109 days at a site in Mediterranean climate conditions, which is similar to the amount of straw left (51%) after 180 days in the study by (Li et al 2016). Thus, under such favourable conditions for C mineralisation, as found in the present study, decomposition and stabilisation of crop residue-derived C occurs very quickly.…”
Section: Long-term Effect Of Straw Addition On Soil Carbonsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Similarly, Tiessen and Stewart (1983) found more rapid depletion of SOC in the fine clay fraction (<0.2 mm) than in the coarse clay (0.2-2 mm) and fine silt (2-5 mm) fractions after a land use change from native prairie to arable land. In an in situ incubation experiment, Li et al (2016) studied labelled residues mixed into mineral soil over two years and found that after 60 days, 61% of the applied residue C was left in the soil, with 75% of it still stored in particles >2000 mm and only 0.1% was stored in microaggregates <53 mm, which correspond to the SC fraction. After 780 days, 26% of the applied C was left in the soil, with only 39% of it stored in the >2000 mm particles and 2.4% stored in the SC fraction.…”
Section: Long-term Effect Of Straw Addition On Soil Carbonmentioning
confidence: 99%