2014 IEEE/ACIS 13th International Conference on Computer and Information Science (ICIS) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icis.2014.6912152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed video transcoding based on MapReduce

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kim et al [15] propose a distributed transcoding system based on Apache Hadoop to improve transcoding throughput for H.264 and HEVC encoders, achieving higher throughput for larger batches of videos. Song et al [31] obtain similar results that in [15] for their Hadoop-based approach using H.264 encoders. As an evolution of these previous proposals, Sameti et al [27] propose a transcoder agnostic design based on Apache Spark.…”
Section: Related Worksupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Kim et al [15] propose a distributed transcoding system based on Apache Hadoop to improve transcoding throughput for H.264 and HEVC encoders, achieving higher throughput for larger batches of videos. Song et al [31] obtain similar results that in [15] for their Hadoop-based approach using H.264 encoders. As an evolution of these previous proposals, Sameti et al [27] propose a transcoder agnostic design based on Apache Spark.…”
Section: Related Worksupporting
confidence: 74%
“…On the other hand, this work attempts to introduce a third-party file system in the system, and wants to further improve the transcoding efficiency by reducing the disk I / O and network time overhead during the MapReduce process of the cluster. Song et al [25] also implemented a distributed video transcoding system based on MapReduce and FFmpeg, and experimentally analyzed that the system has different transcoding speed promotion rates for videos of different sizes. It can achieve a speed increase of 1.38 times, 1.51 times, and 1.64 times for 500MB, 1GB, and 2GB video processing respectively.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the above researches [17,21,22,24,25,[28][29][30] have proposed a variety of ideas for the application of processing large-scale video data transcoding, and revealed the advantages of distributed transcoding for traditional transcoding methods when processing large-scale data. On the other hand, they did not further explore the factors affecting the efficiency of distributed transcoding under the proposed mechanism.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we pay attention to video transcoding on cloud infrastructures, there are few works in the literature that are directly related to the work proposed in this paper. Previous proposed architectures for distributed video encoding/transcoding in the cloud has been proposed for H.264 [17][18][19][20][21]. These approaches rely on MapReduce or on cluster of machines to perform the encoding, therefore the main difference with the proposed work is that the number of encoders cannot be modified dynamically once the encoding is started.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%