2012
DOI: 10.1364/boe.3.002050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed scanning volumetric SDOCT for motion corrected corneal biometry

Abstract: We present a method, termed distributed scanning OCT (DSOCT), which reduces the effects of patient motion on corneal biometry utilizing current-generation clinically available spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) systems. We first performed a pilot study of the power spectrum of normal patient axial eye motion based on repeated (M-mode) SDOCT. Using DSOCT to reduce the effects of patient motion, we conducted a preliminary patient study comparing the measured anterior and posterior corneal curva… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To reduce the effects of patient motion during acquisition, we utilized a technique we previously developed termed distributed scanning OCT (DSOCT). 23 DSOCT uses a custom scanning protocol applied on a commercial spectral domain OCT instrument that reduces the temporal correlation between adjacent A-scans and allows for motion estimation and removal of patient bulk motion that occurs during volume acquisition. Using DSOCT, we previously found that differences in corneal power measurements between OCT and standard keratometric techniques were reduced over no motion correction in normal eyes, 23, 24 Figure 1 illustrates the DSOCT technique.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce the effects of patient motion during acquisition, we utilized a technique we previously developed termed distributed scanning OCT (DSOCT). 23 DSOCT uses a custom scanning protocol applied on a commercial spectral domain OCT instrument that reduces the temporal correlation between adjacent A-scans and allows for motion estimation and removal of patient bulk motion that occurs during volume acquisition. Using DSOCT, we previously found that differences in corneal power measurements between OCT and standard keratometric techniques were reduced over no motion correction in normal eyes, 23, 24 Figure 1 illustrates the DSOCT technique.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13][14] A tradeoff always exists between fast image acquisition and high image quality, and if the image acquisition speed is increased, then SNR will suffer. [7,10] OCT scanners laterally sample a target by steering the beam across one or two dimensions in order to produce a 2D image or a 3D volume. Processing the samples from the target to create an image is also a computationally intensive task, and the total time it takes to process the samples into an image can be higher than the line scan acquisition rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the sample and motion characteristic, different concepts for motion compensation either during image acquisition or by means of image postprocessing have been published for OCT applications. Methods used during image acquisition include increasing the imaging speed to reduce acquisition time [11], triggering acquisition by synchronization of OCT data with an independent measurement of the phase of the respiratory cycle [15], and adapting the scanning scheme to the individual application [16]. In accordance with recent publications [13], we observed that the effect of motion artifacts is significantly smaller in single brightness scans (B-scans) (fast scanning axis) than in subsequent B-scans forming classic three-dimensional (3D) stacks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%