2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.08.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed hydrological model for mapping evapotranspiration using remote sensing inputs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
203
1
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 233 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
203
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This model needs some input data, including a DEM, daily values of precipitation and temperature, information about soil use, vertical gradient of temperature, and precipitation. The model may be viewed as a simplified version of a distributed hydrological model (Wigmosta et al 1994;Chen et al 2005), and it considers superficial and groundwater flow formation. Full model equations are reported, for example, in Groppelli et al (2011b) and Bocchiola et al (2011), and the reader is referred there for details.…”
Section: The Glaciohydrological Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This model needs some input data, including a DEM, daily values of precipitation and temperature, information about soil use, vertical gradient of temperature, and precipitation. The model may be viewed as a simplified version of a distributed hydrological model (Wigmosta et al 1994;Chen et al 2005), and it considers superficial and groundwater flow formation. Full model equations are reported, for example, in Groppelli et al (2011b) and Bocchiola et al (2011), and the reader is referred there for details.…”
Section: The Glaciohydrological Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the lack of daily data for longer periods (only 2012 is available), it was not possible to pursue a calibration/validation strategy using data subsets. In Table 3 the parameters estimated via calibration are reported, together with those estimated a priori based on the available literature, for example, wilting point for vegetated areas u w 5 0.15 (Chen et al 2005;Wang et al 2009) and field capacity u l 5 0.35 (e.g., Ceres et al 2009). Reservoir number for overland flow (e.g., Rosso 1984) are set to n s 5 3 based on several studies.…”
Section: Hydrological Model Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wania et al (2010) describe a model of wetland hydrology and biogeochemistry (LPJ-WHyMe), but do not include consideration of microtopography or lateral flows. Others, such as BEPS (Chen et al, 2005 and InTEC v3.0 (Ju et al, 2006) include sophisticated ecohydrological and biogeochemical sub-models capable of simulating threedimensional hydrology (for large-scale topography) coupled to peatland carbon dynamics. Sonnentag et al (2008) further adapted BEPS to model the effects of mesoscale (site level) topography on hydrology, and hence on CO 2 exchange at Mer Bleue bog.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Viney and Sivapalan (2001) applied a conceptual Large Scale Catchment Model (LASCAM) to the Swan-Avon catchment in Western Australia, and found that stream flow, sediment yield, and nutrient yields had all increased since European settlement in the catchment. Remote sensing techniques can benefit water flux related ecosystem service modeling in three ways (Kite and Pietroniro, 1996;Pietroniro and Prowse, 2002;Chen et al, 2005;Liu and Li, 2008): 1) by identifying significant areal phenomena such as snow cover, surface water (e.g. flooded areas, lake areas) or sediment plumes from original remote sensing image; 2) by developing relationships between remote sensing data and parameters of interest to provide model parameters such as soil moisture and water quality; and 3) by quantifying important surface parameters such as land cover types and the LAI from remote sensing data.…”
Section: Water Flux Related Ecosystem Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%