2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2015.12.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed finite-time velocity-free attitude coordination control for spacecraft formations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
111
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
111
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the above observations and motivated by the literatures, in this paper, the distributed observer‐based attitude consensus control for multiple rigid bodies whose kinematics evolves on SO (3) is developed. The distributed observer is designed on an undirected and connected network topology among the followers, but only a subset of followers has access to the leader's trajectory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the above observations and motivated by the literatures, in this paper, the distributed observer‐based attitude consensus control for multiple rigid bodies whose kinematics evolves on SO (3) is developed. The distributed observer is designed on an undirected and connected network topology among the followers, but only a subset of followers has access to the leader's trajectory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering this, the homogeneous observer (HO) and finite‐time observer are widely designed to estimate the unknown state information. However, the HO can only realize the semiglobal finite‐time stability, and the convergence time cannot be estimated . The finite time observer in other works can only guarantee the observation errors converge to a region of zero in finite time, and the attitude derivatives instead of angular velocity were obtained in finite time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In three‐dimensional (3D) space, when considering a rigid body's translation and rotation simultaneously, its attitude control become a basic and also challenging work because the attitude is described by a nonlinear manifold and its kinematics is a nonlinear system . In the presence of modeling uncertainties, actuator faults, and disturbances, the finite‐time attitude control laws with terminal sliding mode have been proposed by Zhou et al The velocity‐free attitude synchronization with finite‐time convergence has been designed by Zou et al, and the finite‐time attitude synchronization of rigid bodies using Modified Rodrigues parameters (MRPs) attitude representation has been investigated by Meng et al and Du et al However, in the above mentioned literatures, their finite‐time intervals cannot be artificially adjusted but rely on some parameters and initial conditions of the system. Motivated by this observation, the fixed‐time stabilization is proposed by Polyakov to make the finite‐time interval be independent of initial state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%