2019
DOI: 10.1002/rnc.4542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A specified‐time control framework for control‐affine systems and rigid bodies: A time‐rescaling approach

Abstract: Summary This paper addresses the specified‐time control problem for control‐affine systems and rigid bodies, wherein the specified‐time duration can be designed in advance according to the task requirements. By using the time‐rescaling approach, a novel framework to solve the specified‐time control problem is proposed, and the original systems are converted to the transformation systems based on which the specified‐time control laws for both control‐affine systems and rigid bodies are studied. Compared with th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in this case, the control will become discontinuous which may cause the chattering phenomenon. Furthermore, in practice, there is no accurate zero-detecting device for (45), which suggests that the nonlinear functions ( 9) and ( 22) are more practical. Moreover, from the proof procedure of Theorem 2, it follows that η → ω0 as 𝜅 2 → 0 in the nonlinear function (22), and the term η can be seen as the estimated desired accelerated speed.…”
Section: ) ▪mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in this case, the control will become discontinuous which may cause the chattering phenomenon. Furthermore, in practice, there is no accurate zero-detecting device for (45), which suggests that the nonlinear functions ( 9) and ( 22) are more practical. Moreover, from the proof procedure of Theorem 2, it follows that η → ω0 as 𝜅 2 → 0 in the nonlinear function (22), and the term η can be seen as the estimated desired accelerated speed.…”
Section: ) ▪mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the SimMechanics experiments, the constructed physical rigid body's mass matrix and moment of inertia matrix depend on the size of rigid body and its density. 40,45 Without loss of generality, the lengths of the first, second, third principal axes are denoted as L = (L 1 , L 2 , L 3 ) T ∈ R 3 , and the density of rigid body is denoted as 𝜚. Thereafter, the mass of rigid body is defined as m = 4 3 𝜋L 1 L 2 L 3 𝜚, and the corresponding mass matrix is denoted as M = diag{m, m, m}.…”
Section: Simmechanics Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, the SimMechanics experiments are provided to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed theoretical results. In SimMechanics experiments, 34,42 the control torque is applied to a physical system that is constructed by SimMechanics module in MATLAB software, rather than the mathematical model (8) and (9).…”
Section: Simmechanics Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consensus problem of multiagent systems (MASs) has drawn great attention due to its broad applications in many areas such as formation control of robotic teams, information fusion of sensor networks, attitude alignment of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles, and so on . In the past decade, many works have been represented to address the consensus control problem for linear or affine nonlinear MASs (see, for example, References ). However, in some applications such as the chemical reaction, the pendulum control, and the wind turbine control, the dynamic models of systems are in nonaffine form such that the control input does not appear linearly, which makes the controller design more difficult and challenging than affine systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it is more desirable to design finite‐time consensus protocol so that consensus is achieved in a fast way. The finite‐time control idea was given in Reference and expanded to MASs . An observer‐based control algorithm is designed in Reference for achieving finite‐time consensus tracking of second‐order integrator MASs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%