[1992] Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems
DOI: 10.1109/icdcs.1992.235101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed constraint satisfaction for formalizing distributed problem solving

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
154
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
154
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years we have seen an increasing interest in Distributed Constraint Satisfaction Problem (DisCSP) formulations to model combinatorial problems arising in distributed, multi-agent environments [2,14,16,17,18,20]. There is a rich set of real-world distributed applications, such as in the area of networked systems, for which the DisCSP paradigm is particularly useful.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years we have seen an increasing interest in Distributed Constraint Satisfaction Problem (DisCSP) formulations to model combinatorial problems arising in distributed, multi-agent environments [2,14,16,17,18,20]. There is a rich set of real-world distributed applications, such as in the area of networked systems, for which the DisCSP paradigm is particularly useful.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This aspect has been overlooked in the literature due to the fact that, so far, the performance of DisCSP algorithms has been evaluated mainly on satisfiable instances. We study the performance of two well known DisCSP algorithms -asynchronous backtracking (ABT) [18], and asynchronous weak commitment search (AWC) [17]-on SensorDCSP. Both ABT and AWC use agent priority ordering during the search process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we employ an ontological layer, based on a logic theory of configuration described in [6] that enables communication by mapping the specific representations onto more general ontological concepts from the configuration domain (compare [17]). Problem-solving itself can be compared to the work of [19], where the authors of that publication describe how several agents can build major subassemblies on their own, but these subassemblies must "hook together" in a compatible way. As a mechanism for problem representation, they propose a distributed Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP) and present several algorithms, such as Asynchronous Backtracking [19].…”
Section: Distributed Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problem-solving itself can be compared to the work of [19], where the authors of that publication describe how several agents can build major subassemblies on their own, but these subassemblies must "hook together" in a compatible way. As a mechanism for problem representation, they propose a distributed Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP) and present several algorithms, such as Asynchronous Backtracking [19]. However, in contrast to distributed CSP solving, the cooperation among configuration agents has to take two major extensions into account: − On the one hand, configuration tasks have a dynamic nature in the sense that the set of problem variables changes depending on the initial requirements and on the decisions taken during the problem-solving process.…”
Section: Distributed Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yokoo [14], [15] has proposed solving distributed CSP by using an asynchronous backtracking algorithm. This can be done by allowing agents to run concurrently and asynchronously.…”
Section: Distributed Cspmentioning
confidence: 99%