2014
DOI: 10.1590/s1983-40632014000100001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribuição espacial de atributos químicos do solo em área de pastagem e floresta

Abstract: INTRODUÇÃOAs alterações na composição da vegetação de ecossistemas naturais associadas a práticas de manejo, que são atribuídas a fatores como exploração agrí-cola, pecuária e, principalmente, florestal (Alencar et al. 2004), trazem consequências não só em relação à biodiversidade, mas, também, quando se analisa a deterioração causada aos solos e a sua possibilidade de reutilização e/ou conservação (Chaves et al. 2012). ABSTRACT RESUMOEstudos que visam a analisar os efeitos causados pela ação antrópica sobre … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
8
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
8
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, silt, MA, MI, Ds, and TPV showed a moderate spatial dependence (25-75%). Similar results were found by Silva & Lima (2013) and Aquino et al (2014b), who observed that clay, TS, and Ds are considered as the attributes that have a strong spatial dependence. These authors also observed that silt is considered as an attribute with moderate spatial dependence.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…On the other hand, silt, MA, MI, Ds, and TPV showed a moderate spatial dependence (25-75%). Similar results were found by Silva & Lima (2013) and Aquino et al (2014b), who observed that clay, TS, and Ds are considered as the attributes that have a strong spatial dependence. These authors also observed that silt is considered as an attribute with moderate spatial dependence.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Being non-existent chemical attributes studies still in soils under regenerated areas with agroforestry systems. By contrast, it is observed in literature several studies of this variability in soils under sugarcane cropping throughout Brazil (PELUCO et al, 2015;AQUINO et al, 2014;MARQUES JR et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Some studies have adopted geostatistical methods (Montanari et al 2012;Silva Júnior et al 2012;Oliveira et al 2013) and multivariate analysis (Freitas et al 2012;Marques Júnior et al 2014) to analyze data on quantify the impacts of soil use and land occupation. Geostatistics has been used to characterize patterns variability for physical (Oliveira et al 2013), chemical (Aquino et al 2014), mineralogical (Bahia et al 2015), and biological attributes of soil (Bahia et al 2014(Bahia et al , 2015. Sample planning is usually defined using semivariogram ranges (Montanari et al 2005(Montanari et al , 2012.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%