2022
DOI: 10.1002/gj.4384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinguishing the Miocene Kiel and Antwerpen Members (Berchem Formation) and their characteristic horizons using cone penetration tests in Antwerp (northern Belgium)

Abstract: The glauconitic sands in the upper part of the lower-middle Miocene Berchem Formation are subdivided into the Kiel and Antwerpen Members. Although lithological differences between both members are well known from temporary outcrops in the Antwerp city area, they are difficult to distinguish in boreholes, which hinders regional mapping of these units. In this study, we investigate whether both members can be distinguished on cone penetration tests (CPTs). For this purpose, we correlated multiple outcrops-in whi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On this CPT, the q c spike was not observed, which may indicate discontinuities in the sandstone horizon. Similar lateral discontinuities in the q c spikes were also observed for Kiel Member sandstone-bearing horizons in the City of Antwerp area by Deckers & Everaert (2022).…”
Section: Cpt Characterizations and Correlationssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…On this CPT, the q c spike was not observed, which may indicate discontinuities in the sandstone horizon. Similar lateral discontinuities in the q c spikes were also observed for Kiel Member sandstone-bearing horizons in the City of Antwerp area by Deckers & Everaert (2022).…”
Section: Cpt Characterizations and Correlationssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…4). Based on the data presented by Deckers & Everaert (2022) for the city of Antwerp area, this interval may correlate to the Kiel Member of the Berchem Formation. Confirmation for this interpretation, at least for the upper part of the interval on correlation panel 1, is sustained by field observations from the AIA temporary outcrops.…”
Section: Cpt Characterizations and Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations