2000
DOI: 10.1017/s0016672399004036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinguishing recombination and intragenic gene conversion by linkage disequilibrium patterns

Abstract: SummaryDeterministic theory suggests that reciprocal recombination and intragenic, interallelic conversion have different effects on the linkage disequilibrium between a pair of genetic markers. Under a model of reciprocal recombination, the decay rate of linkage disequilibrium depends on the distance between the two markers, while under conversion the decay rate is independent of this distance, provided that conversion tracts are short. A population genetic three-locus model provides a function Q of two-locus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When two distinct gene pools meet, a mosaic genome is produced (Chapman and Thompson 2002), containing intact segments from each contributing founder population (Nordborg and Tavare 2002). Genomes that have undergone recent hybridization will have largely intact ancestral haplotypes, while recombination will act to disrupt these haplotypes in subsequent generations (Wiehe et al 2000). If admixture is ancient, reciprocal recombination, genetic drift, and mutation will have eroded the association between markers from parental populations and a greater density of markers will be required to detect significant associations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When two distinct gene pools meet, a mosaic genome is produced (Chapman and Thompson 2002), containing intact segments from each contributing founder population (Nordborg and Tavare 2002). Genomes that have undergone recent hybridization will have largely intact ancestral haplotypes, while recombination will act to disrupt these haplotypes in subsequent generations (Wiehe et al 2000). If admixture is ancient, reciprocal recombination, genetic drift, and mutation will have eroded the association between markers from parental populations and a greater density of markers will be required to detect significant associations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the rate of decay of LD by crossing over increases as the distance between the markers increases, with gene conversion it is independent of distance for markers that are sufficiently far apart (Wiehe et al 2000). Therefore, the 1518 B. Padhukasahasram et al…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the rate of decay of LD by crossing over increases as the distance between the markers increases, with gene conversion it is independent of distance for markers that are sufficiently far apart (Wiehe et al 2000). Therefore, the effects of gene conversion are significant only for short-range markers whereas the effects of crossing over dominate for long-range markers (Andolfatto and Nordborg 1998;Wiehe et al 2000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, if three loci, A/a, B/b and C/c, are on a chromosome in that order and only B/b is within a conversion track, LD between A/a and B/b and between B/b and C/c is affected by conversion but the LD between A/a and C/c is not. Several methods for inferring the relative rates of gene conversion and recombination have been based on this idea [74][75][76][77][78] .…”
Section: Inbreeding Inversions and Gene Conversionmentioning
confidence: 99%