2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12711-020-00538-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinguishing pleiotropy from linked QTL between milk production traits and mastitis resistance in Nordic Holstein cattle

Abstract: Background: Production and health traits are central in cattle breeding. Advances in next-generation sequencing technologies and genotype imputation have increased the resolution of gene mapping based on genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Thus, numerous candidate genes that affect milk yield, milk composition, and mastitis resistance in dairy cattle are reported in the literature. Effect-bearing variants often affect multiple traits. Because the detection of overlapping quantitative trait loci (QTL) regio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
33
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
4
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding production traits, the 5 highest genetic correlations were observed for MY and PY (0.86 ± 0.01), Fat% and Protein% (0.66 ± 0.01), FY and PY (0.64 ± 0.01), MY and Protein% (−0.57 ± 0.01), and FY and Fat% (0.49 ± 0.01; Table 3). Cai et al (2020) also reported high genetic correlations between MY and PY (0.78), FY and MY (0.40), and FY and PY (0.56). Likewise, Kadarmideen et al (2003) and Martin et al (2019) reported similar results as in this study.…”
Section: Genetic Correlation Within Trait Groupsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Regarding production traits, the 5 highest genetic correlations were observed for MY and PY (0.86 ± 0.01), Fat% and Protein% (0.66 ± 0.01), FY and PY (0.64 ± 0.01), MY and Protein% (−0.57 ± 0.01), and FY and Fat% (0.49 ± 0.01; Table 3). Cai et al (2020) also reported high genetic correlations between MY and PY (0.78), FY and MY (0.40), and FY and PY (0.56). Likewise, Kadarmideen et al (2003) and Martin et al (2019) reported similar results as in this study.…”
Section: Genetic Correlation Within Trait Groupsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…One of these studies investigated, albeit unsuccessfully, whether one of the non-coding candidate SNP obtained from the GWAS was associated with GC expression, leaving the functional mechanisms underlying this association elusive [13]. Interestingly, the proposed candidate SNPs showed antagonistic allele effects for milk yield (MY) (the high CM resistance allele was linked to low MY, and vice versa [7,13,16]), and one study concluded that a single pleiotropic variant regulates both of the traits [17]. Furthermore, this locus harbours QTL for many traits including body conformation, fertility, and longevity [11,15,[18][19][20][21][22], implying pleiotropy, which remains to be investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, additionally one more candidate gene located on BTA 9 and related to milk production was observed (Mustafa et al, 2018). Multi-trait meta-analysis in Nordic cattle detected several loci with pleiotropic effects on milk production and mastitis resistance (Cai et al, 2020). We identified another candidate gene Zinc finger protein (ZNF469), associated with milk production and mastitis resistance in cattle in the intergenic region of BTA 18.…”
Section: Milk and Related Traitsmentioning
confidence: 49%