2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.06.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinguishing hepatic hemangiomas from metastatic tumors using T1 mapping on gadoxetic-acid-enhanced MRI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…T 1 relaxation time is an absolute value, and appears to be more reliable and less subjective than the direct hepatic signal intensity method to assess liver function [25]. The syngo MapIt tool enables rapid MRI sequencing with high resolution using 3D VIBE [26]. In our department, we include this sequence in routine liver MR imaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T 1 relaxation time is an absolute value, and appears to be more reliable and less subjective than the direct hepatic signal intensity method to assess liver function [25]. The syngo MapIt tool enables rapid MRI sequencing with high resolution using 3D VIBE [26]. In our department, we include this sequence in routine liver MR imaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observations lead to the assumption that the SNR of haemangiomas decreased due to the contrast media being pooled in dilated sinusoid. Actually, it was reported that the T1‐shortening effect of haemangiomas was stronger than that of metastatic liver tumours at the hepatobiliary phase in a study using T1 value . Therefore, it was supposed that the contrast between metastatic tumours and liver parenchyma increased, and that of haemangiomas decreased more than metastatic liver tumours because the SNRs of both haemangiomas and liver parenchyma decreased .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, it was reported that the T1shortening effect of haemangiomas was stronger than that of metastatic liver tumours at the hepatobiliary phase in a study using T1 value. 17 Therefore, it was supposed that the contrast between metastatic tumours and liver parenchyma increased, and that of haemangiomas decreased more than metastatic liver tumours because the SNRs of both haemangiomas and liver parenchyma decreased. 18 However, the contrast between haemangiomas and liver parenchyma increased more than that between metastatic liver tumours and liver parenchyma, both quantitatively and qualitatively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When imaging is performed with gadoxetic acid, haemangiomas may appear hypointense relative to liver parenchyma during the equilibrium and delayed phases, as there will be substantial liver parenchymal uptake from as early as 3–5 min after injection, producing the so-called pseudo-washout sign, which can mimic a hypervascular tumour [ 78 ] . Thus, the expected prolonged enhancement due to filling in of haemangiomas is less readily observable because of intense liver parenchymal enhancement [ 79 ] (Fig. 6).…”
Section: Diagnostic Applications In Oncological Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors have suggested T 1 quantitative mapping or additional dynamic imaging with a non-specific extracellular contrast agent [ 79 ] .…”
Section: Diagnostic Applications In Oncological Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%