Proceedings 7th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (Cat. No.98EX226)
DOI: 10.1109/icccn.1998.998834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinguishing congestion losses from wireless transmission losses: a negative result

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
108
2
1

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
108
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…IEEE 802.11 WLAN). Given the independence of σ i , we write (9). The expectation of Y is computed in the Appendix.…”
Section: Case Of Medium Bandwidth-delay Product Wireless Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…IEEE 802.11 WLAN). Given the independence of σ i , we write (9). The expectation of Y is computed in the Appendix.…”
Section: Case Of Medium Bandwidth-delay Product Wireless Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strategy in the detection of congestion results in a poor performance of the protocol when packets are lost in the network for other reasons than congestion, e.g. [1,4,7,9]. Transmission errors on a noisy link, typically a wireless link, form the main source for non-congestion losses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, methods to implicitly distinguish corruption from congestion have, thus far, not been successful [10,16]. However, Performance Enhancing Proxies (PEPs) [12] have been shown to improve TCP performance [7], but break the end-to-end semantics of the transport layer connection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on R. Jain [7], Saad Biaz and Nitin Vaidya [8], and David A. Hayes and Armitage [9], let, R (round-trip delay(rtt-delay)) and T (throughput) are functions of the w (sender window). To determine the Knee (the point at which throughput starts increasing), measure R and the gradient, of the delay window-curve.…”
Section: Normalised Delay Gradient (Ndg) As Losspredictormentioning
confidence: 99%