2017
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1706466114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinguishing attosecond electron–electron scattering and screening in transition metals

Abstract: Electron-electron interactions are the fastest processes in materials, occurring on femtosecond to attosecond timescales, depending on the electronic band structure of the material and the excitation energy. Such interactions can play a dominant role in light-induced processes such as nano-enhanced plasmonics and catalysis, light harvesting, or phase transitions. However, to date it has not been possible to experimentally distinguish fundamental electron interactions such as scattering and screening. Here, we … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
53
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
2
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(5) is capable of capturing most of the features characterizing our experimental ESP data. The value of Γ ee is assumed to be constant and equal to 1.5 × 10 14 s −1 and is consistent with experimental measurements [36] indicating that photogenerated hot electrons in metals can thermalize with characteristic times even shorter than 10 fs through carrier-to-carrier or carrier-to-phonon scattering. Similar relaxation times have also been measured in the case of lead-iodide hybrid perovskite, a semiconductor having similar band gap energy to Cs 3 Sb for hot electrons with excess energies on the order of 0.5 eV [37].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…(5) is capable of capturing most of the features characterizing our experimental ESP data. The value of Γ ee is assumed to be constant and equal to 1.5 × 10 14 s −1 and is consistent with experimental measurements [36] indicating that photogenerated hot electrons in metals can thermalize with characteristic times even shorter than 10 fs through carrier-to-carrier or carrier-to-phonon scattering. Similar relaxation times have also been measured in the case of lead-iodide hybrid perovskite, a semiconductor having similar band gap energy to Cs 3 Sb for hot electrons with excess energies on the order of 0.5 eV [37].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…A recent study [12] could disentangle electron-electron scattering from screening effects in photoemission delays from solid state targets. In particular, the delay contribution of the screening effect was found to be negligible for electrons with a final state energy higher than 20 eV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attosecond metrology has provided the first results with this kind of electron transport in solids looking at the escape time of photoemitted electrons [9][10][11][12][13] and considering a simple ballistic transport model. The question about the correct escape velocity of the electrons and whether their dynamics are controlled by the periodic crystal potential on such small time and length scales has been debated [11,14,[15][16][17], and mainly free-electron-like propagation was observed or deduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was demonstrated in proof-of-principle experiments for gaseous atomic [10][11][12][13][14][15][16] and molecular [17][18][19] targets. Attosecond time-resolved photoemission spectroscopy is currently being extended to complex targets [6,20], such as nanostructures and nanoparticles [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28], and solid surfaces [9,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36], making it possible to examine, for example, the dynamics of photoemission from a surface on an absolute time scale [37] and suggesting, for example, the time-resolved observation of the collective motion of electrons (plasmons) in condensed-matter systems [38][39][40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%