2019
DOI: 10.1080/15583058.2019.1615152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinct Element Modelling of Masonry Walls under Out-Of-Plane Seismic Loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence it was decided to reduce jkn until the building modes of vibrations resulted in values that were similar to previous observations but respected the relationship with brick dimensions. This tuning strategy to establish the material properties has been implemented by multiple researchers (Papantonopoulos et al, 2002, Psycharis et al, 2003, Lemos and Campos Costa, 2017, Meriggi et al, 2019 who calibrated their models by best fitting stiffness parameters to match MPa/m, jks =845 MPa/m, friction angle = 30 ̊ ). The aforementioned joint material properties were selected to ensure that the eigenvalue analysis delivered a period of 0.25 s for the Y translational mode of vibration, coinciding with the estimate given by equation T = 0.0625·h 0.75 from NZS1170.5 (2004) and AS1170.4 (2007.…”
Section: Comparison Between Lumped Mass-spring and 3d Dem Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence it was decided to reduce jkn until the building modes of vibrations resulted in values that were similar to previous observations but respected the relationship with brick dimensions. This tuning strategy to establish the material properties has been implemented by multiple researchers (Papantonopoulos et al, 2002, Psycharis et al, 2003, Lemos and Campos Costa, 2017, Meriggi et al, 2019 who calibrated their models by best fitting stiffness parameters to match MPa/m, jks =845 MPa/m, friction angle = 30 ̊ ). The aforementioned joint material properties were selected to ensure that the eigenvalue analysis delivered a period of 0.25 s for the Y translational mode of vibration, coinciding with the estimate given by equation T = 0.0625·h 0.75 from NZS1170.5 (2004) and AS1170.4 (2007.…”
Section: Comparison Between Lumped Mass-spring and 3d Dem Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thanks to the careful reproduction of masonry pattern and to the capability of the DEM in simulating the motion in finite kinematics, the collapse mechanism and the crack pattern induced by the seismic action are detected, without the need to define the mechanism a priori. The effectiveness of the Discrete Element Method (DEM) to capture the seismic behaviour of masonry structures has already been proved in Literature (Azevedo et al 2000;de Felice 2011;Al Shawa et al 2012;Malomo et al 2018; Mordanova and de Felice 2018; Meriggi et al 2019) but its use for seismic assessment still needs to be settled. Accordingly, a procedure for static pushover and dynamic impulsive analyses has been developed in (Gobbin et al 2021) and applied here to seven masonry churches located in L'Aquila (Italy) region and damaged during the 2009 earthquake.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although originally addressed to granular materials and geotechnics, they have shown their capabilities in the simulation of masonry structures [16][17][18][19]. In particular, DEM has been largely used in the simulation of stone block masonry [20,21]. Application to historic [22] and archaeological [23,24] structures has also proved to be effective in the seismic simulation of ancient remains.…”
Section: Introduction 1restoration Of Archaeological Remainsmentioning
confidence: 99%