2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-19569-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinct dynamics of social motivation drive differential social behavior in laboratory rat and mouse strains

Abstract: Mice and rats are widely used to explore mechanisms of mammalian social behavior in health and disease, raising the question whether they actually differ in their social behavior. Here we address this question by directly comparing social investigation behavior between two mouse and rat strains used most frequently for behavioral studies and as models of neuropathological conditions: C57BL/6 J mice and Sprague Dawley (SD) rats. Employing novel experimental systems for behavioral analysis of both subjects and s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
58
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible explanation for the differences between the study by Matthews et al and ours is the use of different models systems (mice vs. rats). We have recently shown that compared to mice, rats present with higher and more immediate motivation for social interactions [ 61 ]. Accordingly, a pervious study found that changes in the social motivation of acutely isolated rats are restricted to young age [ 62 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible explanation for the differences between the study by Matthews et al and ours is the use of different models systems (mice vs. rats). We have recently shown that compared to mice, rats present with higher and more immediate motivation for social interactions [ 61 ]. Accordingly, a pervious study found that changes in the social motivation of acutely isolated rats are restricted to young age [ 62 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One limitation of our work was the use of a very specific population for our study: male adult Sprague Dawley rats. Although we do not anticipate major problems in using the modified Food Competition test in other rat strains, behavioral differences have been already reported in several social and nonsocial behaviors between Long-Evans, Wistar and Sprague–Dawley rats 23 . It could be possible that different rat strains would react differently to the subtle conflict we induce in the cage during the modified Food Competition test, and that acute aggressive encounters could be observed depending on the strain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…These results thus underscore the necessity of including multidimensional analysis of behavior and the importance of taking into account qualitative measurements when describing social interactions. Furthermore, although it might be surprising that the tube test is not a reliable measure of established hierarchy in rats, important differences in social behavior between mice and rats are starting to be reported 22 , 23 . Rats are more socially tolerant, and less hierarchical compared to mice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results thus underscore the necessity of including multidimensional analysis of behavior and the importance of taking into account qualitative measurements when describing social interactions. Furthermore, although it might be surprising that the tube test is not a reliable measure of stablished hierarchy in rats, important differences in social behavior between mice and rats are starting to be reported 22,23 . Rats are more socially tolerant, and less hierarchical compared to mice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%