Distinct clinical characteristics and helminth co-infections in adult tuberculosis patients from urban compared to rural Tanzania

Abstract

BackgroundDifferences in rural and urban settings could account for distinct characteristics in the epidemiology of tuberculosis (TB). We comparatively studied epidemiological features of TB and helminth co-infections in adult patients from rural and urban settings of Tanzania.MethodsAdult patients (≥ 18 years) with microbiologically confirmed pulmonary TB were consecutively enrolled into two cohorts in Dar es Salaam, with ~ 4.4 million inhabitants (urban), and Ifakara in the sparsely populated Kilombero District with ~ 400 000 inhabitants (rural). Clinical data were obtained at recruitment. Stool and urine samples were subjected to diagnose helminthiases using Kato-Katz, Baermann, urine filtration, and circulating cathodic antigen tests. Differences between groups were assessed by χ2, Fisher’s exact, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Logistic regression models were used to determine associations.ResultsBetween August 2015 and February 2017, 668 patients were enrolled, 460 (68.9%) at the urban and 208 (31.1%) at the rural site. Median patient age was 35 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 27–41.5 years), and 454 (68%) were males. Patients from the rural setting were older (median age 37 years vs. 34 years, P = 0.003), had a lower median body mass index (17.5 kg/m2 vs. 18.5 kg/m2, P < 0.001), a higher proportion of recurrent TB cases (9% vs. 1%, P < 0.001), and in HIV/TB co-infected patients a lower median CD4 cell counts (147 cells/μl vs. 249 cells/μl, P = 0.02) compared to those from urban Tanzania. There was no significant difference in frequencies of HIV infection, diabetes mellitus, and haemoglobin concentration levels between the two settings. The overall prevalence of helminth co-infections was 22.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 20.4–27.0%). The significantly higher prevalence of helminth infections at the urban site (25.7% vs. 17.3%, P = 0.018) was predominantly driven by Strongyloides stercoralis (17.0% vs. 4.8%, P < 0.001) and Schistosoma mansoni infection (4.1% vs. 16.4%, P < 0.001). Recurrent TB was associated with living in a rural setting (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 3.97, 95% CI: 1.16–13.67) and increasing age (aOR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.02–1.10).ConclusionsClinical characteristics and helminth co-infections pattern differ in TB patients in urban and rural Tanzania. The differences underline the need for setting-specific, tailored public health interventions to improve clinical management of TB and comorbidities.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s40249-018-0404-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Intestinal parasites and HIV in Ethiopian tuberclosis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

“…This evidence suggests the presence of strong immunological and geographical connection between helminths and TB that contributes to high burden of helminthiases among TB patients. 61 , 62 , 63 …”

Are intestinal helminths playing a positive role in tuberculosis risk? A systematic review and meta-analysis

“…As shown in Fig 1, we found a total of 1594 papers following the initial search of databases, and after excluding duplicates and/or non-eligible papers, 20 articles had eligibility to be considered in the current systematic review and meta-analysis [9,12,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. The Kappa test between the reviewers showed interobserver agreement of 93.75%, which was considered to be an excellent result.…”

A systematic literature review of schistosomiasis in urban and peri-urban settings

“…The majority of the studies set out to study urban schistosomiasis either in comparison to rural schistosomiasis, to assess changes over time, or to specifically assess prevalence and intensity levels in certain areas and among certain population groups at that point in time [ 21 – 24 ]. Many studies also included questionnaires in order to better understand the socioeconomic circumstances of the study participants, as well as to learn more about their habits regarding their water-related recreational activities, source and use of water, as well as access to sanitary facilities [ 25 – 27 ].…”