Distance decay of community dynamics in rocky intertidal sessile assemblages evaluated by transition matrix models

Abstract

It is well known that the similarity in species composition between two communities decays with the geographic distance that separates them. It is thus likely that the similarity in the dynamics of two communities also decays with distance, because the distance-decay relationship is fundamental in nature. However, the distancedecay relationships of community dynamics have not yet been revealed. We used transition matrix models to evaluate distance-decay relationships of seasonal community dynamics (from spring to summer) in rocky intertidal sessile assemblages along the Pacific coast of Japan between 31°N and 43°N. We evaluated the distance-decay relationships of whole-community dynamics and of three dynamics-related components-recruitment, disturbance, and species interaction (competition and facilitation)-for communities separated by distances ranging from several meters to thousands of kilometers. The similarity of the recruitment dynamics among communities declined rapidly with distance within the fine spatial scale, but only moderately within larger scales. The similarity of the disturbance dynamics was independent of distance, and the similarity of species interaction declined slightly with increasing distance. The similarity of whole-community dynamics declined rapidly with distance at a fine spatial scale and moderately at larger scales. The fact that the distance-decay relationship of whole-community dynamics was similar to that of recruitment may suggest that recruitment processes are the most important determinant of spatial variability of community dynamics at our study sites during the study period.

Characterising biofouling communities on mussel farms along an environmental gradient: a step towards improved risk management

“…The structure of biofouling communities became less similar with increasing geographical distance between sampled mussel farms, making this study the first known, documented account of distance− decay in biofouling communities associated with artificial structures. The slope of the relationship between distance and community similarity in this study was similar to those recorded for intertidal sessile assemblages, but greater than those documented for marine fish communities (Oliva & Teresa 2005, Tsujino et al 2010). This contrast makes sense given that the rate of decline of similarity would be greater for organisms with a lower dispersal potential (e.g.…”

“…ascidian species with a short-lived larval stage or intertidal algae with limited dispersal ranges) in open and continuous marine systems, compared to mobile organisms (Soininen et al 2007, Tsujino et al 2010. Furthermore, smaller organisms, which respond more intensively to fine scale environmental variation due to their shorter generation times, may have lower similarity at small distances (Gillooly et al 2002, Tsujino et al 2010.…”

Environmental and spatial controls of macroinvertebrate functional assemblages in seagrass ecosystems along the Pacific coast of northern Japan

“…Nakaoka et al, 2005;Tsujino et al, 2009;Okuda et al, 2010). Numerous empirical studies have shown that the dispersal of many macroinvertebrate species and convergence of the variation of community structure (as well as functional diversity) are at the meso-scale level (i.e., tens of kilometers; Hovel, 2003;Boström et al, 2006;Reed and Hovel, 2006;Yamada et al, 2011).…”

Beta diversity of marine bacteria depends on temporal scale

“…This pattern can result from a variety of mechanisms, including environmental heterogeneity, dispersal limitation, migration, and stochastic events (Hubbell 2001, Hanson et al 2012. The effects of these mechanisms depend on the spatial scale over which they occur, and such scaledependent patterns have been observed for a variety of taxa in many environments; e.g., plant communities (Nekola andWhite 1999, Condit et al 2002), sessile invertebrate and algal communities (Tsujino et al 2009), and microbial communities (Ramette andTiedje 2007, Martiny et al 2011).…”