2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.10.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissociative semantic breakdown in Alzheimer's disease: Evidence from multiple category fluency test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 15 27 28 Literature documented that category-specific deficits may occur due to different brain systems, although it is still being debated. 29 30 In our study, we observed comparable accuracy for the 2 categories in the test, suggesting that the animal and fruit categories can be used interchangeably for the detection of AD and MCI. In contrast to semantic fluency which produces items in attribute relationships, association fluency measures the ability to generate semantically associated words that are in coordinate relationships.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“… 15 27 28 Literature documented that category-specific deficits may occur due to different brain systems, although it is still being debated. 29 30 In our study, we observed comparable accuracy for the 2 categories in the test, suggesting that the animal and fruit categories can be used interchangeably for the detection of AD and MCI. In contrast to semantic fluency which produces items in attribute relationships, association fluency measures the ability to generate semantically associated words that are in coordinate relationships.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Midterm cognition was assessed using the Memory Impairment Screen (MIS) 22,23 and the Category Fluency Test (CFT). 24 The MIS has been validated as an efficient, reliable, and valid screening for dementia and Alzheimer's disease, and the CFT has been validated and used in studies of Alzheimer's disease in both literate and illiterate patients. An individual was defined as being cognitively impaired on the basis of the MIS criteria if they scored 4 or less.…”
Section: Measurement and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because it is a health-related area, research methodologies used in this field tend to adhere to methods that are more quantitative, which offer an illusion of objectivity, based on the control of "variables" and the alleged homogeneity of subjects (CHIARI et al, 2012 1 ; TING et al, 2013;BEFI-LOPES et al, 2014;CAPELLINI, CÉSAR and GERMANO, 2015). In research on diagnosis, for example, the statistical norm that guides the tests in question does not reflect the state of the subjects under evaluation, but it ends up imposing over them authoritatively, hampering their position toward the evaluation (FRIEDMAN, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%