Dissemination and Impact of Multi-criteria Decision Support Methods for IT Project Evaluation

Bernroider, Edward; Obwegeser, Nikolaus; Stix, Volker

doi:10.1109/hicss.2014.143

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 55 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…At the main stage of this study, we concluded that the method succeeded in parsing the draw voting process by developing it by adding a winning gap (distance) between alternatives during the pairwise contest and then multiplying the existing gap by the weight or population of DM. the results of the model trial case study, the voting results of all DMs on ten (10) ICT projects in the Palembang city government, it was found that and also the results of the sensitivity test against the three criteria affected project evaluation. In the future, we will try a ranking system to get results that can determine transparent winners in a project in government.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The results show that the effectiveness and efficiency of evaluation are increasingly important for a project [15]. In this regard, several researchers have implemented MCDM methods, both in the DSS or SPKK [16][8][9] [10]. Many organizations realize the importance of the MCDM method because the use of the MCDM method increases effectiveness in decisionmaking.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Assessment System of Local Government Projects Prototype in Indonesia

Setiawan¹,

Husnawati²,

Tasmi³

2021

IJACSA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this research is to build an application that is used for project evaluation and provide recommendations on project performance in local government agencies. In this study, project evaluation was carried out using the Group Decision Making (GDM) model based on the Group Decision Support System (GDSM) concept. The project output and outcome parameters used by the Decision Maker (DM) use a hybrid of the Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) and Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) methods to reduce subjectivity in scoring qualitative data and to determine project ratings from all DMs. Copeland Score voting method. The results of application computing on the implementation of Group Decision Support System (GDSS) and MCDM indicate that the project ranking process will be faster and more accurate. The results of the sensitivity test show that two criteria have a great influence on project performance so that they have a very important role in project evaluation.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment System of Local Government Projects Prototype in Indonesia

Setiawan¹,

Husnawati²,

Tasmi³

2021

IJACSA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There have been many previous studies using this method, such as [4]; [5]); [6]); [7]; [8]); [9]. One popular method used for it is the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Local Government Project Assessment Application Using Group Decision Support System (GDSS) Model

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The assessment process is an important step in the evaluation, as it underlies the successful evaluation of a project. One solution to make the project assessment more objective is to apply the concept of a Group Decision Support System (GDSS), which in the decision process uses computing. This research tries to implement the concept by building an application for project evaluation and providing recommendations on project performance in local government agencies. The proposed Decision Makers (DMs) are involved: Executives of Government Institutions, Project Management Work Units, Business Process Owner Units, and Communities represented by the DPRD. The computational process uses the Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method, and the Copeland scores voting method ranks the project of all DMs. The results of application computing in implementing GDSS and MCDM indicate that the process of determining project rankings will be faster and more accurate.

show abstract

Dissemination and Impact of Multi-criteria Decision Support Methods for IT Project Evaluation

Cited by 2 publications

References 55 publications

Assessment System of Local Government Projects Prototype in Indonesia

Assessment System of Local Government Projects Prototype in Indonesia

Local Government Project Assessment Application Using Group Decision Support System (GDSS) Model

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About