Disruptive technologies in agricultural operations: a systematic review of AI-driven AgriTech research

Abstract

The evolving field of disruptive technologies has recently gained significant interest in various industries, including agriculture. The fourth industrial revolution has reshaped the context of agricultural technology (AgriTech) with applications of artificial intelligence (AI) and a strong focus on data-driven analytical techniques. Motivated by the advances in AgriTech for agrarian operations, the study presents a state-of-the-art review of the research advances which are, evolving in a fast pace over the last decades (due to the disruptive potential of the technological context). Following a systematic literature approach, we develop a categorisation of the various types of AgriTech, as well as the associated AI-driven techniques which form the continuously shifting definition of AgriTech. The contribution primarily draws on the conceptualisation and awareness about AI-driven AgriTech context relevant to the agricultural operations for smart, efficient, and sustainable farming. The study provides a single normative reference for the definition, context and future directions of the field for further research towards the operational context of AgriTech. Our findings indicate that AgriTech research and the disruptive potential of AI in the agricultural sector are still in infancy in Operations Research. Through the systematic review, we also intend to inform a wide range of agricultural stakeholders (farmers, agripreneurs, scholars and practitioners) and to provide research agenda for a growing field with multiple potentialities for the future of the agricultural operations.

A structured literature review on the interplay between emerging technologies and COVID-19 – insights and directions to operations fields

“…In this vein, organizations and the whole society can benefit from a wide range of disruptive digital technologies (M. Gupta et al, 2021 ; Spanaki et al, 2021 ) to face an exceptional event like COVID-19. These include artificial intelligence (Belhadi et al, 2021 ; Fosso Wamba, Bawack, et al, 2021 ), blockchain (Dubey, Gunasekaran, Bryde, et al, 2020 ; Wamba & Queiroz, 2020 ), big data analytics (Dubey, Gunasekaran, Childe, et al, 2020 ; Fosso Wamba, Queiroz, et al, 2020 ), the internet of things (A. Sinha et al, 2019 ), 5G (Siriwardhana et al, 2020 ), 3d printing (Belhouideg, 2020 ), virtual reality (Mao et al, 2020 ), augmented reality (Sahu et al, 2020 ), digital twin applications (Ivanov & Dolgui, 2020 ), as well as the Industry 4.0 applications (Kumar & Singh, 2021 ; Queiroz, Ivanov et al, 2020 ).…”

Digital technologies, sustainable open innovation and shared value creation: evidence from an Italian agritech business

“…Recent research on the agri-food industry and 4.0 technology have pointed out the emergence of a new typology of agri-food business: Agritech businesses (Spanaki et al, 2021). Agritechs have been identified as businesses actively embracing the 4.0 paradigm (Lowry et al, 2019).…”

“…They differ from each other in accordance with their position within the supply chain and the aim of technological implementation. Thus, it is possible to distinguish between agritech growers, agritech integrators, and agritech distributors (Marvin, 2018;Spanaki et al, 2021):…”

A planetary boundaries perspective on the sustainability: resilience relationship in the Kenyan tea supply chain

“…While both sustainability and resilience have been discussed in the broader Supply Chain Management (SCM) tenets, their interrelationship in the Agricultural Supply Chain (ASC) has received little attention (Leat & Revoredo-Giha, 2013;Michel-Villarreal et al, 2019). This neglect is unfortunate because the expected world population growth combined with socio ecological factors adds even more pressure to ASCs (Despoudi, 2021;Spanaki et al, 2021;Stone et al, 2015a). Even though organizations have embarked on implementing various sustainability practices there is limited knowledge about the broader effects of sustainability practices employed in organizations on the supply chain ability to endure disruptions (Fahimnia & Jabbarzadeh, 2016).…”