A planetary boundaries perspective on the sustainability: resilience relationship in the Kenyan tea supply chain

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine whether agricultural supply chains (ASC) can be simultaneously sustainable and resilient to ecological disruptions, using the Planetary Boundaries theory. The nine different Planetary Boundaries i.e. climatic change, biodiversity loss, biogeochemical, ocean acidification, land use, freshwater availability, stratosphere ozone depletion, atmospheric aerosols and chemical pollution are examined in relation to ASC sustainability and resilience. Kenya’s tea upstream supply chain sustainability and resilience from the ecological point of view is questioned. This study adopts a multi-case study analysis approach of nine producer organisations from Kenya’s tea supply chain. The data from the in-depth semi-structured interviews and a focus group discussion are analysed using thematic analysis. The Kenyan tea supply chain producers are not aware of all the nine planetary boundaries, although these impact on their resilience practices. They are engaged in pursuing both sustainability and resilience practices. They implement mainly environmental practices in relation to sustainability, while only a few of them are implementing resilience practices. The sustainability and resilience concepts were found to be interrelated, but resilience does not improve at the same pace as sustainability. It is suggested that the relationship between sustainability and resilience is non-linear. Limitations and future research avenues are also provided.

Interplay in Circular Economy Innovation, Business Model Innovation, SDGs, and Government Incentives: A Comparative Analysis of Pakistani, Malaysian, and Chinese SMEs

“…The UN sustainable development agenda 2030 has garnered wide-ranging attention from industries and academia around the world, underscoring the importance of scare resources, avoiding environmental degradation, and preventing hunger and poverty in societies. In this regard, the UN sustainability agenda has launched the concept of Triple Bottom Line (TBL) and emerged as the potential driver for competitive advantage [1]. Due to this reason, many multinational companies have launched practices of sustainable development as per the UN agenda [2]; however, SMEs have widely shown scarce engagement in these practices around the world.…”

Assessment and Principles of Environmentally Sustainable Food and Agriculture Systems

“…Sustainable agriculture and crop production's key goals are to include a healthy environment, economic profitability, and social and economic equality in the production process [27], while its basic principles are social inclusion, economic development, and environmental sustainability [28]. Sustainability performance enhanced by the adoption of technology and the integration of economic, social, and environmental dimensions [29], could be defined as a potential generator of competitive advantage [30].…”

Dynamic capabilities and sustainability performance: Exploring the moderating role of environmental dynamism in the Norwegian fishing industry

“…This means that firms continue to generate profits over time without harming the environment or the social system (Pagell & Shevchenko, 2014; Seuring et al, 2022). Thus, incorporating it into the overall business performance has been identified as a potential generator of competitive advantage (Mwangi et al, 2021; Rodríguez‐Espíndola et al, 2022). Additionally, increasing concern about environmental and social issues in the food industry has raised the importance of sustainability performance (Grimm et al, 2014; Silva et al, 2021).…”