1987
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(87)80198-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disruption of embryonic and fetal development due to preimplantation chemical insults: A critical review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Larger decidual swellings are indicative of normal peri-implantation development and are a continuous index of preimplantation damage. 2 When the exposed blastocysts were allowed to develop to term, a significant increase in the rate of stillbirth was observed ( Table 4). The overall birth rate and the live birth rate showed no relationship between exposure and outcome.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Larger decidual swellings are indicative of normal peri-implantation development and are a continuous index of preimplantation damage. 2 When the exposed blastocysts were allowed to develop to term, a significant increase in the rate of stillbirth was observed ( Table 4). The overall birth rate and the live birth rate showed no relationship between exposure and outcome.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resorption rates in embryos after exposure to agents capable of causing embryonic dysfunction can be increased in circumstances in which the blastocyst is capable of being activated and can implant. 2 The embryo fails to develop as a result of the toxic exposure, and the implantation site begins to disorganize and eventually resorbs. The injury pro- t Percentage of embryos exposed to ultrasonic beams recovered as viable pups after transfer to surrogate mothers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A significant increase in preimplantation loss was observed only in the GD0 group. Treatment of mouse embryos with MMS at preimplantation stages was previously shown to induce their death both in vitro (Fabro et al, 1984;Iannaccone et al, 1987) and in vivo (Generoso et al, 1991;Rutledge et al, 1992;Nagao et al, 1997;Rutledge, 1997). Treatment of male rats or mice with MMS induces a dominant lethal phenotype in embryos d erived fro m th e ex pos ed sp er m (Ehling and Neuhauser-Klaus, 1990;Ashby et al, 1996) and chromosomal damage in gametes results in such a phenotype of embryos (Brewen et al, 1975;Katoh and Tanaka, 1980).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rat is the most commonly used experimental animal for toxicity evaluation and has a longer pregastrulation period compared with that in the mouse. The preimplantation period is approximately 4 days in mice and 5 days in rats (Witschi, 1962;Iannaccone et al, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%