2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disrupting Demand for Commercial Seed: Input Subsidies in Malawi and Zambia

Abstract: The Indaba Agricultural Policy Research Institute is a non-profit company limited by guarantee and collaboratively works with public and private stakeholders. IAPRI exists to carry out agricultural policy research and outreach, serving the agricultural sector in Zambia so as to contribute to sustainable pro-poor agricultural development.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
71
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(25 reference statements)
1
71
2
Order By: Relevance
“…212-219) summarized these drivers into five constructs, namely relative advantage, complexity, observability, compatibility, and trialability, with the first construct being an incentive while the rest are capacity constructs. However, this model of the farmer decision-making process has come under increased criticism for not taking into account some of the institutional factors that influence individuals' behavior in the modeling of human decision-making process and behavior (Lynne 1995;Mason and Ricker-Gilbert 2013). It especially has been criticized for ignoring the role that human/personal values, and mental models in general, play in the decision-making process (Heisey and Brennan 1991;Gowdy and Olsen 1994;Lynne 1995;Kaufman 2007;Mason and Ricker-Gilbert 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…212-219) summarized these drivers into five constructs, namely relative advantage, complexity, observability, compatibility, and trialability, with the first construct being an incentive while the rest are capacity constructs. However, this model of the farmer decision-making process has come under increased criticism for not taking into account some of the institutional factors that influence individuals' behavior in the modeling of human decision-making process and behavior (Lynne 1995;Mason and Ricker-Gilbert 2013). It especially has been criticized for ignoring the role that human/personal values, and mental models in general, play in the decision-making process (Heisey and Brennan 1991;Gowdy and Olsen 1994;Lynne 1995;Kaufman 2007;Mason and Ricker-Gilbert 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this model of the farmer decision-making process has come under increased criticism for not taking into account some of the institutional factors that influence individuals' behavior in the modeling of human decision-making process and behavior (Lynne 1995;Mason and Ricker-Gilbert 2013). It especially has been criticized for ignoring the role that human/personal values, and mental models in general, play in the decision-making process (Heisey and Brennan 1991;Gowdy and Olsen 1994;Lynne 1995;Kaufman 2007;Mason and Ricker-Gilbert 2013). Recent studies acknowledge that human beings are influenced by social, psychological, and cultural factors, and that these factors in turn influence the decision-making process (Demeritt and Hoff 2015); For instance, while neoclassical microeconomic theory considers economic actors to be selfish (i.e., act in self-interest), there is evidence that individuals' decision-making and actions are influenced by what others in their circle of influence (i.e., network) are thinking and expect from them (Fourcade 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Politicians tend to allocate more funds for maize subsidies to their favourable electorates and the voters respond positively to such incentives (Mason and Ricker-Gilbert, 2013). Urban and male bias are the two major biases -towards towns rather than rural areas and towards men, not women -are principal factors in explaining Africa's food insecurity.…”
Section: Original Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fiscal sustainability of this arrangement for hybrid maize cultivation remains an open question (see e.g. Dorward and Chirwa, 2011;Mason and Ricker-Gilbert, 2013) 14 .…”
Section: Sustainability Of Local Maize Versus Hybrid Maizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This appears to apply particularly to (aggregate) data distributed by the Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security. Mason and Ricker-Gilbert (2013) find evidence that input subsidy programs may be politically motivated. Whatever is the case, we avoid any suspicion of using data manipulated for these purposes by focusing on local maize.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%