2016
DOI: 10.1080/02508060.2016.1143202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disputes over land and water rights in gold mining: the case of Cerro de San Pedro, Mexico

Abstract: This article analyzes different visions and positions in a conflict between the developer of an open-pit mine in Mexico and project opponents using the echelons of rights analysis framework, distinguishing four layers of dispute: contested resources; contents of rules and regulations; decision-making power; and discourses. Complexities in this study manifest how communities' land and water rights are circumvented by governmental bodies and ambivalent regulations favouring the large mining company. This process… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
31
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Decision-making on water allocation rights is still dominated by big players in river basin councils as underground water rights are granted to large food and mining corporations in water scarce regions (COMDA, 2017;Stoltenborg and Boelens, 2016), who use their economic influence to get additional water rights despite drilling bans in place by Conagua, as found during fieldwork in early 2017. Reis (2014) documented how the water authority allowed the existence of the black market in the Valley of Mexico basin, where powerful stakeholders could buy out thousands of cubic meters from impoverished farmers.…”
Section: Growing Gap Between Water Supply and Demandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decision-making on water allocation rights is still dominated by big players in river basin councils as underground water rights are granted to large food and mining corporations in water scarce regions (COMDA, 2017;Stoltenborg and Boelens, 2016), who use their economic influence to get additional water rights despite drilling bans in place by Conagua, as found during fieldwork in early 2017. Reis (2014) documented how the water authority allowed the existence of the black market in the Valley of Mexico basin, where powerful stakeholders could buy out thousands of cubic meters from impoverished farmers.…”
Section: Growing Gap Between Water Supply and Demandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through these movements, marginalized resource-user groups challenge existing multiscalar arrangements to produce other scales, and they do so by organizing across scales-connecting multiple actors, levels and issues. As Stoltenborg and Boelens (2016) conclude: "by linking, for example, local village initiatives, women's groups, and journalists and newspapers with provincial indigenous and peasant federations, national ombudsman and civil rights offices, international research centers, and environmental and human rights NGOs, the negotiation forces (including access to research, information dissemination and possibilities for international arbitrage) can become more balanced and one-sided discourses can be challenged." In Canada, Neville and Weinthal (2016) document how an environmental movement strategically connected a local struggle against a liquefied natural gas plant to the more distant problem of extraction of this gas and thus to broader anti-fracking and climate justice struggles.…”
Section: Social Movements As Polycentric Arrangements and As Excludmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be successful, affected local actors need to forge multi-actor alliances that work on multi-scalar levels, thus creating civil society networks that are internally complementary while connecting the local, national, and global struggles for water justice. Examples exist in the mining sector [e.g., Bogaert (2015) for Morocco; Bebbington et al (2010) for Peru, Bolivia, Ecuador; Ochoa (2006) and Stoltenborg and Boelens (2016) for Mexico; Urkidi (2010) for Chile]. Compared to mobilizations against mining sector extraction, so far, grassroots actions against water-extractive agribusiness exports have been limited at best, largely because of strong and deeply asymmetrical dependency ties within the sector (Vos and Boelens 2014).…”
Section: Local and Multi-scalar Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%