2019
DOI: 10.1590/1984-6398201913157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disponibilidad léxica en procesos de formación inicial de futuros profesores de inglés

Abstract: RESUMEN A pesar de la riqueza de estudios existentes en el área de disponibilidad léxica, el léxico de las comunidades científicas y/o profesionales ha pasado casi inadvertido por los investigadores. En este contexto, se presentan los resultados de un estudio de disponibilidad léxica en el cual se encuestó a 28 estudiantes de 4o año de Pedagogía en Inglés en 16 centros de interés (ocho generales y ocho especializados del tipo pedagógico-disciplinar). El objetivo de esta investigación es establecer si existen d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, the results from the different analyses are shown using the lexical statistics, which comprised the following indexes and concepts [83,84]: WA: word average; DW: different words; CI: cohesion index (different words and word average ratio); LAI: lexical availability index per word (the higher the LAI, the more latent the word is in the participants' memory); iLAI: individual lexical availability index. This allowed researchers to determine how close the lexicon of a participant was with respect to the group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, the results from the different analyses are shown using the lexical statistics, which comprised the following indexes and concepts [83,84]: WA: word average; DW: different words; CI: cohesion index (different words and word average ratio); LAI: lexical availability index per word (the higher the LAI, the more latent the word is in the participants' memory); iLAI: individual lexical availability index. This allowed researchers to determine how close the lexicon of a participant was with respect to the group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the pioneering work by Wilks & Meara ( 2002 ) explained above, we are only aware of the studies of Ferreira & Echeverría ( 2010 ), Borodkin et al ( 2016 ) with EFL learners and Salcedo and colleagues (e.g. Quintanilla & Salcedo 2019 ) with Spanish FL learners. These studies focused on studying semantic associations and yielding them into graphs.…”
Section: Vocabulary Production and Lexical Availability In Efl As A F...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, Ferreira and Echevarría in 2010 (Ferreira & Echeverría, 2010 ) found that whereas native speakers were able to organize their lexical items effectively into subcategories, EFL learners could only distinguish among large semantic categories and not beyond. Other studies with EFL learners (e.g Quintanilla & Salcedo 2019 ) constrain to the description of learners’ EFL vocabularies and their cohesion degrees and communicability. So far, we are not aware of studies with EFL data that focus on identifying graph metrics and mathematical regularities in the learners’ mental lexicon.…”
Section: Vocabulary Production and Lexical Availability In Efl As A F...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Habida cuenta de la importancia de estos estudios para planificar correctamente la enseñanza de lenguas en el ámbito hispánico, surgió entre la comunidad investigadora una nueva inquietud: la evaluación de la competencia léxica del futuro profesorado. Así, han proliferado los trabajos que toman como referencia, bien a estudiantes de magisterio (Herranz, 2018;, De la Maya y López-Pérez, 2020), bien al futuro profesorado de enseñanza secundaria (Cerda, Salcedo, Pérez y Marín, 2017;Quintanilla y Salcedo, 2019;Zambrano, 2021).…”
Section: In Troducciónunclassified