2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.07.22.501185
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Displacement experiments provide evidence for path integration in Drosophila

Abstract: Like many other animals, insects are capable of returning to previously visited locations using path integration. Recently, Drosophila has been added to the list of insects thought capable of this navigational memory. Existing experimental evidence, however, has a potential confound. Here we show that pheromones deposited at the site of reward might enable flies to find previously rewarding locations even without memory. Thus, we designed an experiment to determine if flies can use path integration memory desp… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we suggest that PI and vector memory are not just specialised functions for central place foraging, but rather play a more general role, intrinsic to how the CX supports all spatial behaviour. The high degree of conservation in CX structure across insect species and the existence of PI in species such as Drosophila [ 22 , 23 ] support this extension. For example, a simple modification of the circuit—abolition of the return inhibitory pathway—sustains navigation and exploitation of several food sources in a ‘nomadic’ fashion ( Fig 12 ), reminiscent of Drosophila exploratory behaviour [ 81 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here we suggest that PI and vector memory are not just specialised functions for central place foraging, but rather play a more general role, intrinsic to how the CX supports all spatial behaviour. The high degree of conservation in CX structure across insect species and the existence of PI in species such as Drosophila [ 22 , 23 ] support this extension. For example, a simple modification of the circuit—abolition of the return inhibitory pathway—sustains navigation and exploitation of several food sources in a ‘nomadic’ fashion ( Fig 12 ), reminiscent of Drosophila exploratory behaviour [ 81 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…At the same time, the conserved nature of the CX circuit suggests it plays a role in the spatial behaviour of all insects, not just central place foragers, species like wasps, bees or ants inhabiting a nest, for which efficient relocation of the nest and food sources by individuals is crucial to survival [ 21 ]. Indeed, path integration has also been observed, over smaller spatial scales, in Drosophila which do not possess a fixed nest or home [ 22 , 23 ]. The existence of homing in “nomadic” insects allows them to revisit a rewarded location, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the fly walks around without finding more food, it will often return to the former feeding site, and if it does not find the food there, it will execute a local search. Optogenetic virtual food can be substituted for real food in this paradigm, giving the experimenter tight control over the location and timing of food encounters (Behbahani et al 2021, Corfas et al 2019, Titova et al 2022). Importantly, these experiments are performed in darkness; thus, the only available inputs to the path integrator are probably proprioceptive cues and/or motor efference copy.…”
Section: Path Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%