The comprehensive review of Lévy patterns observed in the moves and pauses of a vast array of organisms by Reynolds [1] makes clear a need to attempt to unify phenomena to understand how organism movement may have evolved. However, I would contend that the research on Lévy 'movement patterns' we detect in time series of animal movements has to a large extent been misunderstood. The statistical techniques, such as Maximum Likelihood Estimation, used to detect these patterns look only at the statistical distribution of move step-lengths and not at the actual pattern, or structure, of the movement path. The path structure is lost altogether when move steplengths are sorted prior to analysis. Likewise, the simulated movement paths, with step-lengths drawn from a truncated power law distribution in order to test characteristics of the path, such as foraging efficiency, in no way match the actual paths, or trajectories, of real animals. These statistical distributions are, therefore, null models of searching or foraging activity. What has proved surprising about these step-length distributions is the extent to which they improve the efficiency of random searches over simple Brownian motion. It has been shown unequivocally that a power law distribution of move step lengths is more efficient, in terms of prey items located per unit distance travelled, than any other distribution of move step-lengths so far tested (up to 3 times better than Brownian), and over a range of prey field densities spanning more than 4 orders of magnitude [2].