2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2018.08.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dispersive micro solid-phase extraction (DµSPE) with graphene oxide as adsorbent for sensitive elemental analysis of aqueous samples by laser induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS)

Abstract: In this work, the combination of dispersive micro solid-phase extraction (DµSPE) with laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) was evaluated for simultaneous preconcentration and detection of Zn, Cd, Mn, Ni, Cr and Pb in aqueous samples. Two adsorbent materials were tested in the microextraction step, namely graphene oxide and activated carbon. In both cases, the microextraction process consisted in the dispersion of a small quantity of adsorbent in the sample solution containing the analytes. However, whil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[10][11][12][13] With the aim to overcome the limitation of LIBS analysis of liquids, different strategies involving the use of sample preparation procedures have been investigated by many authors. Among them, it can be cited the absorption or drying of the sample on a solid matrix, [14][15][16][17][18] the application of solid phase extraction (SPE) procedures, 19,20 or the use of modern microextraction procedures in both Liquid-Liquid Microextraction (LLME) [21][22][23][24] and Solid Phase Microextraction (SPME) 25,26 modalities, among others. In general, the use of these sample preparation procedures prior LIBS detection leads to a substantial improvement in the analytical performance of the method, by decreasing the limits of detection at the low µg L -1 level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12][13] With the aim to overcome the limitation of LIBS analysis of liquids, different strategies involving the use of sample preparation procedures have been investigated by many authors. Among them, it can be cited the absorption or drying of the sample on a solid matrix, [14][15][16][17][18] the application of solid phase extraction (SPE) procedures, 19,20 or the use of modern microextraction procedures in both Liquid-Liquid Microextraction (LLME) [21][22][23][24] and Solid Phase Microextraction (SPME) 25,26 modalities, among others. In general, the use of these sample preparation procedures prior LIBS detection leads to a substantial improvement in the analytical performance of the method, by decreasing the limits of detection at the low µg L -1 level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A estratégia foi aplicada em amostras de água de abastecimento público e os LOD obtidos estavam abaixo do estabelecido pelo Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente (CONAMA), que são de 1 mg L -1 para Cr (III) e 0,1 mg L -1 para Cr (VI). Nessa mesma abordagem, Ruiz et al 232 usaram a extração em fase sólida para a pré-concentração simultânea de Cd, Cr, Mn, Ni, Pb e Zn em amostras de água. Os autores usaram o grafeno como material adsorvente e o método proposto foi aplicado com sucesso.…”
Section: Ambientalunclassified
“…Besides the advances in miniaturized extraction techniques, small-scale separation/detection systems are also fundamental to further development of fast, simple, environmentally friendly and portable analytical methods. Thus, several publications have proposed the combination of liquid-phase and solid-phase microextraction techniques with miniaturized detection systems, such as cuvetteless micro-spectrophotometry [5], µvolume-fluorospectrometry [6], ion mobility spectrometry [7], person-portable gas chromatography-mass spectrometry [8], laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy [9], and screen-printed electrodes (SPEs) [10][11][12][13][14][15] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%