Odour Impact Assessment Handbook 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9781118481264.ch5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dispersion Modelling for Odour Exposure Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the output data obtained by means of odor dispersion modeling are typically the "peak" odor concentration values at all points of space-time domain obtained through the application of this "safety" factor F. The applied peak-to-mean factors vary widely from country to country (Piringer et al 2013).…”
Section: Current Methods For Odor Impact Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the output data obtained by means of odor dispersion modeling are typically the "peak" odor concentration values at all points of space-time domain obtained through the application of this "safety" factor F. The applied peak-to-mean factors vary widely from country to country (Piringer et al 2013).…”
Section: Current Methods For Odor Impact Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of the distribution points was made in the prevailing wind direction and included the zone where the odour receptors were prevalent, around the WWTP. Different distances from the source were selected according to the Miedema study [27], for the individuation of the investigation points, ranging from as close to the plant as possible to a distance where the odour was expected to be hardly detectable [42,43].…”
Section: Odour Nuisance Characterization By Questionnaires Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values are often used in the literature related to the determination of the odour impact of various objects [14,19,21,22]. These values may differ between individual countries depending on the solutions adopted [23]. An example may be the Dutch solutions, where the comparative level of the permissible concentration of odours in the air, considered generally acceptable to humans, is up to 5 ou E /m 3 and the permissible value of the frequency of exceedances of 5 ou E /m 3 equals 2% per year [19,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values may differ between individual countries depending on the solutions adopted [23]. An example may be the Dutch solutions, where the comparative level of the permissible concentration of odours in the air, considered generally acceptable to humans, is up to 5 ou E /m 3 and the permissible value of the frequency of exceedances of 5 ou E /m 3 equals 2% per year [19,23]. The differences between the mentioned values, depending on the solutions used in a given country, may potentially affect the perception of the assessment of odour impact of objects such as agri-food plants, determined with the use of mathematical modelling tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%