2023
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202308752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dispersion Energy‐Stabilized Boron and Phosphorus Lewis Pairs

Abstract: An isostructural series of boron/phosphorus Lewis pairs was systematically investigated. The association constants of the Lewis pairs were determined at variable temperatures, enabling the extraction of thermodynamic parameters. The stabilization of the Lewis adduct increased with increasing size of the dispersion energy donor groups, although the donor and acceptor properties of the Lewis pairs remained largely unchanged. This data was utilized to challenge state‐of‐the‐art quantum chemical methods, which fin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the binding energy of the 1A structure is roughly equal to Δ E disp and thus, 1A can be considered as a dispersion-stabilized adduct. Dispersion energy stabilized Lewis pairs were observed recently, e.g., for the binding of boron and phosphorus compounds …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the binding energy of the 1A structure is roughly equal to Δ E disp and thus, 1A can be considered as a dispersion-stabilized adduct. Dispersion energy stabilized Lewis pairs were observed recently, e.g., for the binding of boron and phosphorus compounds …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Dispersion energy stabilized Lewis pairs were observed recently, e.g., for the binding of boron and phosphorus compounds. 21 The decisive role of the ΔE disp stabilization can be also supported by the fact that the structure 1A is flexible with respect to the Bi−Ir bond elongation. The increase of the Bi−Ir distance by 0.317 Å up to 3.0 Å is connected with the energy penalty of 4.1 kcal/mol (Table S2), i.e., only ca.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%