2010
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.2104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dispersal scales up the biodiversity–productivity relationship in an experimental source-sink metacommunity

Abstract: The influence of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning is a major concern of ecological research. However, the biodiversity -ecosystem functioning relationship has very often been studied independently from the mechanisms allowing coexistence. By considering the effects of dispersal and niche partitioning on diversity, the metacommunity perspective predicts a spatial scale-dependence of the shape of the relationship. Here, we present experimental evidence of such scale-dependent patterns. After approximately 5… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As opposed to other regional mechanisms of species coexistence that have found a positive biodiversity-ecosystem function (BEF; for example, source-sink dynamics 30,31 ), our experiment showed how CC dynamics may produce a rarely observed negative BEF relationship 32,33 , which is likely explained by a combination of patch dynamics and the regional dominance of a productive and competitive species (a 'negative selection effect', sensu 34 ). These results suggest that the definition of complementarity and selection effects, as the main drivers underlying the BEF relationship, may need to be revisited to accommodate broader coexistence mechanisms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As opposed to other regional mechanisms of species coexistence that have found a positive biodiversity-ecosystem function (BEF; for example, source-sink dynamics 30,31 ), our experiment showed how CC dynamics may produce a rarely observed negative BEF relationship 32,33 , which is likely explained by a combination of patch dynamics and the regional dominance of a productive and competitive species (a 'negative selection effect', sensu 34 ). These results suggest that the definition of complementarity and selection effects, as the main drivers underlying the BEF relationship, may need to be revisited to accommodate broader coexistence mechanisms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A prime example of the potential applications of our framework is the demonstration that the effects on landscape-level coexistence could be closely linked to those on regional level BEF relationships, suggesting that the effects of fragmentation on extinction debts may also cascade to ecosystem attributes. Our findings illustrate that BEF relationships may depend on the spatial scale over which they occur and the mechanisms generating the gradient of diversity 29,30,38 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The importance of bacteria for the functioning of ecosystems is well known [7], [8] but the impact of bacterial diversity on ecosystem functions is highly variable depending on the environmental conditions, with experimental evidence suggesting either positive [9][15], neutral [10], [16] or negative [15], [17] effects on functioning. Additionally, while both the number and identity of species has been suggested to be important for the functioning of bacterial communities [9][12] little is known about the underlying mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a microscopic scale, discrete water films restrict the dispersal of individual microbial cells or populations [17]. The link between diversity and dispersal [18,19] has led to the hypothesis that bacterial diversity in soils partly reflects the limitation to free dispersal in water-unsaturated media [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%