2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2008.01006.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disparities in the prevalence of cognitive delay: how early do they appear?

Abstract: Summary Cognitively delayed children are at risk for poor mental and physical health throughout their lives. The economically disadvantaged and some race/ethnic groups are more likely to experience cognitive delay, however the age at which delays first emerge and the underlying mechanisms responsible for disparities are not well-understood. The objective of this study is to determine when socio-demographic disparities in cognitive functioning emerge, and identify predictors of low cognitive functioning in earl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
36
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
5
36
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike Boardman et al, who found that reading gaps do not grow and may even converge over time (see also Hillemeier et al, 2009), we found marginal evidence that gaps continue to increase through age 14. Our results could differ because Boardman and colleagues used percentile scores, which are by definition bounded (i.e., ceiling and floor) so that change over time within age groups was concealed by regression to the mean.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike Boardman et al, who found that reading gaps do not grow and may even converge over time (see also Hillemeier et al, 2009), we found marginal evidence that gaps continue to increase through age 14. Our results could differ because Boardman and colleagues used percentile scores, which are by definition bounded (i.e., ceiling and floor) so that change over time within age groups was concealed by regression to the mean.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…These studies showed inconsistent results, with some studies finding poorer outcomes for moderately preterm children,4–9 while others found no differences 4 5 7 10–12. The inconsistencies in these findings are most likely a result of the use of age correction for prematurity or not.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with previous research, [25][26][27] we considered falling within the lowest 10th percentile of age-normed scores at either time point to indicate CD. Following Witt et al, 28 children were further classified as "ever" having CD and as having "resolved," "newly developed," or "persistent" CD.…”
Section: Cognitive Delaymentioning
confidence: 98%