2022
DOI: 10.1111/joor.13316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disparities in oxygen saturation and hypoxic burden levels in obstructive sleep apnoea patient’s response to oral appliance treatment

Abstract: Background Oxygen saturation indices show a strong correlation with long‐term health outcomes. Nonetheless, evidence on the relationship between reduction in respiratory events and increase in oxygenation levels following oral appliance (OA) treatment is scarce. Objectives To verify the relationship between reduction in the apnoea‐hypopnoea index (AHI) and oxygen saturation levels following OA treatment, we have conducted an evaluation of polysomnography (PSG) and clinical parameters associated with the improv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a statistically significant difference was observed in the mean (SD) between non-responders (71.3%, SD=1.1) and responders (81.4%, SD=2.7) in the present study, a clear-cut minimum SpO 2 level that can predict the efficacy of OA treatment is uncertain. Interestingly, a recent study suggested the usefulness of minimum SpO 2 as another success criterion of AHI in the treatment of OSA with MAD [31]. This study reported that there were three different phenotypes in terms of treatment outcomes for MAD, including a group with improvement in AHI only, other groups with improvement in minimum SpO 2 only , greater than 4% SpO 2 , and a group with congruent improvement.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Clinical Characteristics And Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Although a statistically significant difference was observed in the mean (SD) between non-responders (71.3%, SD=1.1) and responders (81.4%, SD=2.7) in the present study, a clear-cut minimum SpO 2 level that can predict the efficacy of OA treatment is uncertain. Interestingly, a recent study suggested the usefulness of minimum SpO 2 as another success criterion of AHI in the treatment of OSA with MAD [31]. This study reported that there were three different phenotypes in terms of treatment outcomes for MAD, including a group with improvement in AHI only, other groups with improvement in minimum SpO 2 only , greater than 4% SpO 2 , and a group with congruent improvement.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Clinical Characteristics And Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 91%