2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.96.041302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disorder-dependent valley properties in monolayer WSe2

Abstract: We investigate the effect of disorder on exciton valley polarization and valley coherence in monolayer WSe 2 . By analyzing polarization properties of photoluminescence, the valley coherence (VC) and valley polarization (VP) is quantified across the inhomogeneously broadened exciton resonance. We find that disorder plays a critical role in the exciton VC, while affecting VP less. For different monolayer samples with disorder characterized by their Stokes Shift (SS), VC decreases in samples with higher SS while… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
9
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
8
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The absence of a Stokes shift between the maxima in PL and PLE exclude any effects of localization on the exciton emission, which might arise because of defects or disorder in our (strained) WSe 2 MLs, in contrast to what was reported in Ref. [42]. Moreover, our PLE measurements provide further evidence for the energy level diagram presented in Fig.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The absence of a Stokes shift between the maxima in PL and PLE exclude any effects of localization on the exciton emission, which might arise because of defects or disorder in our (strained) WSe 2 MLs, in contrast to what was reported in Ref. [42]. Moreover, our PLE measurements provide further evidence for the energy level diagram presented in Fig.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…[66] The Stokes shift between the luminescence and absorption peaks will result in a shift of the CL peaks compared to EELS spectra. [67] However, this effect has been shown to cause only a minor effect compared to the strong-coupling effects we observe here, for nominally undoped materials, whereas it can be significantly increased for n-doped materials. [68] The short interaction of the electron beam with our structure does not cause any significant sample heating or doping, as the positions of the peaks do not depend on the acquisition time, the acceleration voltage within the range of 5 to 30 keV, and also not on the probe current within the range of 10 to 20 nA (see Figure S6, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Thus, we assume the coincidence between the PL emission peak and the optical bandgap only for temperatures above T ≥ 70 K. Our experimental data for ε PL (T) at T ≥ 70 K can be fitted by Equation ( 14) for all three studied materials. The fitting parameters for the three monolayers are listed in [88,89] Furthermore, systematic studies of Stokes shifts in TMDs based on a comparison between PL emission and optical absorption/transmission data provide results in the range of 4-14 meV, [151][152][153][154][155] which are in agreements with the values for Stokes shifts given in our study by the differences between the fitted E op (0) values and the PL peak positions ε PL (0).…”
Section: Phonon-induced Effectssupporting
confidence: 83%