2016
DOI: 10.16995/olh.66
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dismantling the Curriculum in Higher Education

Abstract: The higher education curriculum in the global North is increasingly co-opted for the production of measurable outcomes, framed by determinist narratives of employability and enterprise. Such co-option is immanent to processes of financialisation and marketisation, which encourage the production of quantifiable curriculum activities and tradable academic services. Yet the university is also affected by global socio-economic and socio-environmental crises, which can be expressed as a function of a broader crisis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, French cautioned that this potential can also fragment learning by disaggregating content, and assessing discrete components of learning to the exclusion of integrative learning. Others have also critiqued the intellectual fragmentation of modularisation for its ability to simplify the complexity of the real world (Hall & Smyth, 2016) by limiting opportunity for discussion, analysis of material and reflection, leading to lowered standards (French, 2015).…”
Section: Intensive Modes Of Teaching and The Vu Blockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, French cautioned that this potential can also fragment learning by disaggregating content, and assessing discrete components of learning to the exclusion of integrative learning. Others have also critiqued the intellectual fragmentation of modularisation for its ability to simplify the complexity of the real world (Hall & Smyth, 2016) by limiting opportunity for discussion, analysis of material and reflection, leading to lowered standards (French, 2015).…”
Section: Intensive Modes Of Teaching and The Vu Blockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moving beyond well-established notions of the curriculum as a body of knowledge, as a product, or as process (Smith, 1996(Smith, , 2000, and extending the notion of curriculum as praxis into the idea of curriculum as space and place. In doing so we sought to build upon the work of Hall and Smyth (2016) who outline the range of ways-technological, cultural, and pedagogicalin which the curriculum and the activities of the curriculum are currently often "bounded" within the university. These include, but are not limited to: (i) the cultural narrowness of the curriculum; (ii) modularized curricula structures that create false distance between disciplines and cohorts; (iii) abstract and other forms of assessment that "lock" student knowledge and knowledge artefacts within the virtual and physical walls of the university; and (iv) one dimensional conceptualizations of open education that conflate open with open online.…”
Section: A Response To the Symbiosis Of Neoliberalism And Populism: Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that while we recognised from the outset the spectrum of activities and range of terms that can be associated with RTL, including research-informed teaching, research-based learning and teaching, and research-led learning and teaching, we use the term RTL as an overarching one that encompasses the aforementioned and other recently emerging practices. The latter include, and which we subsequently come on to explore, concepts and approaches related to 'Student as Producer' (Neary, Saunders, Hagyard & Derrico, 2014) the Connected Curriculum (Fung, 2017), and 'the curriculum as praxis' (Hall & Smyth, 2016;Johnston, MacNeill & Smyth, 2019). The latter, concerned with conceptualising and enacting the curriculum as a means and medium through which to address directly the knowledge requirements and needs of our wider communities and society, was identified as a key touchstone and aspirational end point at the outset of the project.…”
Section: Overview and Purpose Of Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%