2023
DOI: 10.4236/jmp.2023.143017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disjointed Equivalence of Gravitational and Inertial Mass

Abstract: Problem-Contemporary physics offers no underlying reason for the equivalence of inertial and gravitational mass. Approach-The equivalence is examined from the new physics provided by the cordus theory, being a non-local hidden-variable (NLHV) theory. Mathematical formalisms are derived for masses and observers in different fabric densities. Findings-A disjointed equivalence is predicted, whereby inertial and gravitational masses are equivalent in any one situation, but a different equivalence holds when the fa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The argument presented in this manuscript does not depend on the case for a deeper unification of gravitation and the strong force, as described elsewhere [20] [25] [26]. Nonetheless a key conceptual part of the present paper is that of the proposed emission field structures, so it is necessary that these field structures be described.…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The argument presented in this manuscript does not depend on the case for a deeper unification of gravitation and the strong force, as described elsewhere [20] [25] [26]. Nonetheless a key conceptual part of the present paper is that of the proposed emission field structures, so it is necessary that these field structures be described.…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Another limitation of the paper is the lack of an overarching mathematical formulation for the Cordus theory. There are components of mathematical formulation available [19] [20] [26]. Furthermore the theory has a strong logical coherence in terms of its lemmas and principles, as demonstrated in its breadth of applicability [1] [19]- [32] [38] [40]- [49].…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%