1949
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.75.318.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disintegration ofHg203

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1951
1951
1974
1974

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The real parameters xi, yi 9 and z% enter in the shape factor Ci and are defined in reference 1. The values of the parameters xi, yi, and z 3 indicated above are the best estimates given by King and Peaslee 49 and Ahrens and Feenberg.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The real parameters xi, yi 9 and z% enter in the shape factor Ci and are defined in reference 1. The values of the parameters xi, yi, and z 3 indicated above are the best estimates given by King and Peaslee 49 and Ahrens and Feenberg.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this investigation, both a thin-lens spectrometer 7,8 and an intermediate-image spectrometer, 9,10 with resolutions of about four percent, were employed. The coincidence measurements were performed with the intermediate-image spectrometer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Recently, Mei, Mitchell, and Huddleston 2 found that the negatron spectrum was complex, having the components E&2~ max =ss 0.82 Mev and Ef$i~ max 35 1.45 Mev. The difference between the two pr components (0.63) Mev did not agree with the observed 7-energy (0.593 ±0.003 Mev), but this could possibly be explained from inaccuracies in the Fermi analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The essential difference between (1) and (2) is that the x's are c-number column-matrices and the ^s are g-number column-matrices. For a direct transition between states in which the nucleons have positive energies, (1) and (2) lead to the same result. On the other hand, if we apply the perturbation formula…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%