2020
DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disentangling relationships between bicultural stress and mental well-being among Latinx immigrant adolescents.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In turn, these cultural stressors can exert deleterious effects on the mental health of firstand second-generation immigrants, such as increasing symptoms of depression and anxiety and compromising well-being (A. Romero et al, 2020). Cultural stressors therefore represent sources of pressure that contribute to psychological impairment in the lives of firstand second-generation immigrants.…”
Section: Cultural Stress Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, these cultural stressors can exert deleterious effects on the mental health of firstand second-generation immigrants, such as increasing symptoms of depression and anxiety and compromising well-being (A. Romero et al, 2020). Cultural stressors therefore represent sources of pressure that contribute to psychological impairment in the lives of firstand second-generation immigrants.…”
Section: Cultural Stress Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limited studies and mixed findings speak to a need to investigate the within-person associations from a holistic perspective by investigating cultural stressors derived from both inferiority and cultural foreignness dimensions and examining their associations with internalizing symptoms. Moreover, the prior study was conducted within a 2-year framework, during early adolescence (Romero et al, 2020), and was thus unable to capture the fluctuation of cultural stressors across the full course of adolescence (Fuhrmann et al, 2015). To promote a more nuanced understanding of the influence of cultural stressors across the course of adolescence from a developmental perspective, a multiwave longitudinal study is needed to examine both (a) whether adolescents who experience more cultural stressors overall across the course of adolescence exhibit higher internalizing symptoms overall, compared with others, and (b) whether a given adolescent would report increased internalizing symptoms when that adolescent experiences increased cultural stressors relative to the adolescent's own average level during the course of adolescence.…”
Section: Cultural Stressors and Adolescents' Internalizing Symptomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, one previous study collected four waves of longitudinal data across 2 years and revealed that experiencing more discrimination than one's own average level is related to more depressive symptoms (Lavner et al, 2022). However, Romero et al (2020) found little evidence of the within‐person impact of cultural stressors on depressive symptoms during the process of adapting to U.S. culture. The limited studies and mixed findings speak to a need to investigate the within‐person associations from a holistic perspective by investigating cultural stressors derived from both inferiority and cultural foreignness dimensions and examining their associations with internalizing symptoms.…”
Section: Cultural Stressors and Adolescents' Internalizing Symptomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An RI‐CLPM isolates between‐person stability from within‐person change via the inclusion of correlated random intercepts (Hamaker et al., 2015). Such a separation makes the RI‐CLPM an attractive approach toward modelling psychological processes, as it allows researchers to focus on the impact temporary departures from a person's trait‐level mean have on within‐person changes at later assessment occasions (e.g., Bahamondes et al., 2021; Marques et al., 2021; Masselink et al., 2018; Romero et al., 2020). That said, research has yet to utilise this method to longitudinally investigate the between‐ and within‐person effects of IRD and GRD on individual‐ and group‐based outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%