2020
DOI: 10.15174/au.2020.2877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diseño de un instrumento para medir la aceptación y los beneficios percibidos de la programación por pares en los cursos universitarios

Abstract: Se presenta el diseño y la validación de un cuestionario orientado a medir la aceptación de la programación por pares y los beneficios percibidos por los alumnos que la utilizan en el contexto educativo universitario. El proceso incluyó el descubrimiento de estos dos factores latentes a través del análisis factorial exploratorio y su respectiva ratificación a través del análisis factorial confirmatorio. Se consiguió obtener valores adecuados de ajuste del modelo (CMIN/DF = 1.15, CFI = 0.98, SRMR = 0.08, RMSEA … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The instrument proved internal consistency, convergent validity and discriminant validity through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis which were conducted in SPSS v25 and AMOS v24. The full validation process of the instrument is described in [30]. Two latent factors were found through exploratory factor analysis in SPSS: acceptance and assessment.…”
Section: Data Collection Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The instrument proved internal consistency, convergent validity and discriminant validity through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis which were conducted in SPSS v25 and AMOS v24. The full validation process of the instrument is described in [30]. Two latent factors were found through exploratory factor analysis in SPSS: acceptance and assessment.…”
Section: Data Collection Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Internal consistency, convergent validity, discriminant validity for both factors in the questionnaire[30].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%