1952
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a106318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disease Resistance From a Wheat × Rye Cross

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1954
1954
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is hoped that work along these lines would prove very useful in studies of rye genetics. JENSEN and KENT (1952) claimed to have successfully transferred leaf rust and mildew resistance of rye to their winter wheat material and finding no addition or substitution cytologically they assumed a reciprocal translation to have taken place, but however, even the transfer might be disputable according to ROSENSTIEL (1950) and O'MARA (1953) who feel that in many cases such 'transfers' could be merely due to contaminate crossing with other wheat varieties.…”
Section: With Triticummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is hoped that work along these lines would prove very useful in studies of rye genetics. JENSEN and KENT (1952) claimed to have successfully transferred leaf rust and mildew resistance of rye to their winter wheat material and finding no addition or substitution cytologically they assumed a reciprocal translation to have taken place, but however, even the transfer might be disputable according to ROSENSTIEL (1950) and O'MARA (1953) who feel that in many cases such 'transfers' could be merely due to contaminate crossing with other wheat varieties.…”
Section: With Triticummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Honor wheat was crossed with Rosen rye and the F1 was backcrossed to Honor. From the backcross progeny an F, selection was obtained which was crossed with Yorkwin winter wheat in 1935, and from this cross the selection 779b10-8-6 was produced (2). The three lines have been grown for several years, and they appear homozygous for all visible characters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%