2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.wsif.2019.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discursive translations of gender mainstreaming norms: The case of agricultural and climate change policies in Uganda

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A 2019 study analyzing policy documents in Uganda found that the rhetoric of “gender mainstreaming” was well integrated, but that this was insufficient to advance gender equality, given the lack of concrete implementation efforts. The study also found that the documents used mainstreaming in a way that tended to depoliticize gender ( Acosta et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Addressing Women's Food Insecurity In a (More) Unstable And mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…A 2019 study analyzing policy documents in Uganda found that the rhetoric of “gender mainstreaming” was well integrated, but that this was insufficient to advance gender equality, given the lack of concrete implementation efforts. The study also found that the documents used mainstreaming in a way that tended to depoliticize gender ( Acosta et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Addressing Women's Food Insecurity In a (More) Unstable And mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Government initiatives in mainstreaming gender policies are less effective in agriculture ( Acosta et al, 2019 ). Women continue to experience information asymmetry in advisory services provided ( Kristjanson et al, 2017 ; Kansiime et al, 2019 ) even though they require it in a higher extent ( Hellin and Fisher, 2018 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, it is tagged on or mentioned in separate documents and debates, in what Acosta et al . (2019, p. 15) refer to as a ‘stale reproduction of set pieces of text [pointing to] significant levels of inertia in thinking and practice around gender mainstreaming issues’.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%